Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cmj328

Never mind, I remember now.. I think a lot of people saw what Shadegg did as an attempt to kill the entire bill. The Stupak Amendment would have gotten the blue dog dems to vote for the bill. If Shadegg’s plan went through, the entire bill would have died as the blue dogs couldn’t support it. It is one of those moves that generates immediate negative emotional reaction but if you start to think about the strategy behind it, it made more sense.


19 posted on 01/25/2010 7:08:08 PM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: mnehring
It does make sense.

Pro-lifers are the monkey, and Shadegg is the organ grinder shouting "Dance, monkey, dance!"

It's not that I don't see the sense. I just don't want to be treated like a monkey.

If pro-lifers think they are being treated like monkeys, they will happily stay home.

20 posted on 01/25/2010 7:46:17 PM PST by cmj328 (Filibuster FOCA--a/k/a ObamaCare--or lose reelection)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: mnehring

And actually, it didn’t make sense. I know people think that Catholics and other pro-lifers are automatons who only vote according to programming, but if the Stupak Amendment had failed due to GOP shenanigans, not only would the GOP-Pro-Life coalition have been permanently ruptured, but all the Blue Dogs would have been clear to pass ObamaCare even with abortion funding, and that would have made negotiations with the Senate much easier. The only people punished at the polls would have been the GOP.


21 posted on 01/25/2010 7:54:04 PM PST by cmj328 (Filibuster FOCA--a/k/a ObamaCare--or lose reelection)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson