Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

For some reason I see this as very discriminatory. I mean why ban the dictionary cuz it defines oral sex, while every day inthe news we hear about tea bagging?
1 posted on 01/25/2010 11:51:13 AM PST by cold666pack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: cold666pack

My dictionary has oral sex in it it says see Bill Clinton


2 posted on 01/25/2010 11:53:56 AM PST by al baby (Hi Mom sarc ;))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cold666pack
The Menifee Union School District is forming a committee to review whether dictionaries containing the definitions for sexual terms should be permanently banned from the district's classrooms, a district official said Friday.

But at the same time, they will teach third-graders every specific detail of homosexual sex.

Actually, this makes sense to the Left. They want to be the ones to tell you what things mean - you don't need no steenkin dictionary. It's like in Europe when the Bible was in Latin, and none of the peasants spoke or read Latin, and the Church's attitude was, "Why do you need to read the Bible? We'll tell you what it says - and what it means."

3 posted on 01/25/2010 12:01:00 PM PST by Talisker (When you find a turtle on top of a fence post, you can be damn sure it didn't get there on it's own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cold666pack
A memo from the district's assistant superintendent for curriculum and instruction this week called the Merriam-Webster dictionary a respected resource but noted district officials found that "a number of referenced words are age-inappropriate."

The American Library Ass. does not believe in the concept of "age appropriate" books. Just as Planned Parnethood, GLSEN, SEICUS, et al do not believe in a concept of "age appropriate" sexual activity.

Anything goes. Any age. Any time. No moral judgements.

5 posted on 01/25/2010 12:08:06 PM PST by a fool in paradise (Keep on truckin', Senator Brown.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cold666pack

Thank you Bill Clinton. I wonder if the definition includes a note: “see also Lewinsky”


7 posted on 01/25/2010 12:10:58 PM PST by BreitbartSentMe (Ex-Dem since 2001 *Folding@Home for the Gipper - Join the FReeper Folders*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cold666pack

The decision was made without consultation with the district’s school board and has raised concerns among First Amendment experts and some parents.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

The very concept of having government schools at all should sound First Amendment alarm bells. Government schools and the First Amendment and freedom of conscience are utterly incompatible!

Let’s examine this one issue:

There are only **two** possible choices for this government school. They allow the dictionaries or they replace them. It is a binary decision. No matter which decision is made the freedom of conscience of some of the parents will be trampled.

As for the taxpayer they will be forced to pay for it regardless of their religious, political, or cultural beliefs.


9 posted on 01/25/2010 12:18:30 PM PST by wintertime (Good ideas win! Why? Because people are not stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cold666pack

I am annoyed that of all things, there is a lack of good reading and media material in schools today. Nobody seems to be interested in creating or distributing it, though it is not insanely expensive, and would be very instructive.

To start with, in the 1960s, Disney Corporation put out a lot of educational films that are still remembered fondly today, because they showed children of that time wonders around the world that children of today don’t ever see. Everything from the “I’m No Fool” safety series, to The Vanishing Prairie, The Living Desert, and White Wilderness.

Yet with all the amazing wonders of the world, this just isn’t being done anymore.

As far as books go, titles that should be in every school library should include:

1) A collection of biographies of great and important Americans.
2) An introduction to the tribes and empires of the Americas in pre-history.
3) A guide to the United States constitution, and its interpretation.
4) A heavily illustrated outline of world history in multimedia.
5) A survey of the American Military and Military-Industrial Complex. 6) A survey of American Agribusiness, Industry and Mining.
7) Histories of American Art, Culture and Music.
8) American wars and conflicts in history.
9) Religion in America, and a survey of religions.
10) A study of immigrant migration to America.


11 posted on 01/25/2010 12:23:31 PM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cold666pack

Moreover, it is a referrence book. What kid is randomly wandering through the dictionary? I bet the parent was looking for something to complain about. This is absolutely nuts. No reason for this sort of nonsense. Man people can be soooo stoopid


14 posted on 01/25/2010 1:04:54 PM PST by the long march
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cold666pack

Banning the dictionary will not preent the kids from hearing it from each other and using the internet etc. It is amazing how stupid adults can be.


23 posted on 01/25/2010 1:37:07 PM PST by votemout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson