Posted on 01/23/2010 3:21:51 AM PST by broken_arrow1
Sarah Palin's decision to campaign for John McCain's reelection bid is dismaying some of her staunchest allies and defenders on the web.
This serves as a much-uninvited buzz-kill to conservatives, who finally had the beam of hope shone on them Tuesday night. Grassroots conservatism made a historic comeback with Scott Brown, who defeated Martha Coakley for Edward Kennedy's Senate seat in the very liberal state of Massachusetts.
Aside from her personal allegiance to John McCain, it is incomprehensible what Palin thinks this will do for the country or her political career, which has made her one of the main inspirations of grassroots enthusiasm.
Of course, there is no doubt that John McCain is an honorable man who proudly served his country. There is also no doubt that the Arizona senator has delivered on selective issues, like the current health care debacle that the majority of Americans disapprove of.
I personally am so humbled by McCain's strongest characteristics that I might even be willing to overlook his daughter Meghan's passive-aggressive dissent from the conservative wing of the Republican Party.
Like many conservatives, I am certain that Sarah Palin is grateful to McCain for plucking her out of Alaska and placing her in the spotlight, where her endless well of conservative energy has been able to flourish.
Truthfully, every grassroots conservative responsible for the surge of vocal dissent to Obama's policies knows that as the frontrunner in the 2008 election, John McCain gave real Americans and independent voters very little to believe in -- that is, until he gave us Sarah Palin, who became the first V.P. candidate in history to carry the entirety of a ticket's momentum.
Looking at McCain's political history, it doesn't take long to determine why he was unable to inspire the grassroots. While one person can make the case for McCain's patriotism, the next can make an equally convincing argument to question his conservatism.
McCain reached across the political aisle in 2007 to develop a soft-amnesty piece of proposed legislation with the late Senator Edward Kennedy. Condemned by critics like Michelle Malkin as a "crap sandwich," the bill proposed small fines to illegal immigrants. Not only did the fines lack the value of the infrastructure these immigrants had taken advantage of for years, but they also allowed them to stay. Americans were outraged, and the bill was never put to a vote.
Previously, McCain had again reached to the far left and crafted McCain-Feingold in 2002, which placed campaign-contribution limits and regulations on selective entities such as businesses and corporations. Coincidentally, that bill was overturned by the Supreme Court this week. This was such a success for freedom and democracy that it immediately won the scathing dissent of President Obama and Senator Chuck Schumer.
Next, John McCain used his power as a United States senator to hysterically denounce enhanced interrogation methods at Guantánamo, and he also became a strong proponent of the campaign to close altogether the prison where detainees are given three full meals a day, hours of free time for activities and religious reading, and the right not to be awakened for interrogations. The average detainee has gained forty pounds during his stay at Gitmo. How's that for "torture?"
Aside from health care, conservative victor Scott Brown campaigned explicitly on the Obama administration's soft treatment of terrorism (providing them with lawyers, having their trials on American soil, and proposing to relocate them to American prisons).
The independent spirits of Americans have responded. Obama's approval ratings have tanked, the life of the current Senate health care disaster has been doubted by Nancy Pelosi, and Americans have overwhelmingly denounced treating terrorists who seek to destroy our democracy and its accompanying constitutional fabric as common criminals with constitutional rights. They did it on Tuesday by giving a half-century-old liberal seat to a conservative.
Sarah Palin had a major effect on this by awakening the once-silent majority. We are now witnessing the loudest dissent against big government ever via average American independents.
Similarly, the Tea Party movement's effectiveness immediately earned it an unflattering nickname from the viewer-lacking hosts on MS-NBC and Air America radio. The movement has adopted all of the same commonsense approaches that Sarah Palin advocated from the moment she sat on the city council of Wasilla to the moment she was elected governor.
Naturally, Palin has earned the title of keynote speaker at the first-ever Tea Party convention, and her political action committee is bringing in massive amounts of money donated by real Americans inspired to continue to challenge the status quo.
Knowing that Palin has already repaid McCain by preventing his campaign from suffering one of the most embarrassing landslide losses in history, one wonders exactly why she would use her momentum stumping for him, especially when he is undeniably perceived by many members of the grassroots community as the same type of status-quo politician she's fought in the past. This sadly leads some to believe that this is mere political payback.
Sarah Palin is no longer a V.P. candidate being told what to say and do by a campaign. She is among the frontrunners of a movement far greater than simply running for president. This kind of a quick decision not only gives the media an open forum to further attack her, but it also purposely creates doubts among her biggest supporters.
While conservatives and independents band together to materialize such a movement in an attempt to undo many years of damage created by liberals and RINOs, Sarah Palin has the responsibility of using her newfound power wisely.
If she doesn't, the people can respond to her just as loudly as they responded in Massachusetts, thus making John McCain one political bridge to nowhere she'll never shake loose.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2433755/posts
Maybe she promised him, and sees no way out except to keep the promise.
The loyal opposition needs to speak up too.
She made a big mistake. Very very delusional.
I hope she hears our voice. Please hear our voice.
If Palin doesn’t help McCain she will be viewed as heartless by many independents who’s votes are needed. She can also used his stage as her own while out stumping for him. This time around, he’s not her boss. She can pack up and head back to Alaska anytime she wants. If McCain wants her crowds at her events, he will have to let her say what she wants.
I still think her announcement was simply timed in an attempt to scare JD from entering the race.
The much more telling endorsement will be that of Crist or Rubio of Florida. I am getting more and more concerned about her choice the longer she delays in making it.
ex animo
davidfarrar
Until John McCain cuts all ties with Steve Schmidt and publically condemns his lies about Sarah.
Sarah should stay away from John McCain. have some self respect.
Because she hasn’t actually campaigned for him, yet, it remains to be seen how enthused she will be. I think it is a simple case of “dance with the one who brung you,” as Bush 41 used to say. She feels like she owes him one, since he brought her to national prominence, and she wants to satisfy that debt.
We'll have to see how she handles it. Doing appearances for McCain is one thing, but if she trashes JD, that'll be it.
Sarah has campaigned as trying to change the direction of Washington. Why Sarah is supporting McCain who has supported bail-outs, defunding of conservative dollars, illegal immigrants, etc. is beyond me. Haywood is a great conservative who deserves her support.
This was an inexcusable political blunder. She needs to rethink this.
She is a RINO and McCain’t is her type. Birds of a feather...
Yes, McCain sucks.
But what else could she do? Geez.
I agree. McCain is the epitome of part of the problem, the good ol’ boys network, the status quo, and the establishment.
I think that my disdain for McCain is stronger than my respect for Palin.
I really hope that AZ will kick McCain to the curb to go home to live with the mess he helped make.
She is doing the honorable thing and the only thing she could do. McCain moved her front and center by making her his VP pick. It is probably the only useful thing he has ever done. How could she say no. It would have caused far more trouble.
She isn’t perfect.
Better Sarah makes little political mistakes now than later. At least this shows she has good character attributes - loyalty to someone who gave her a big break - which she has yet to learn is a sometime drawback on the national political stage. Savviness will come later but at a price, I’m afraid.
Meantime J.D.Hayworth needs everyone’s support to take on McCain. He doesn’t need Palin, he needs us.
Palin is certainly within her right to support whomever she pleases. She violates that right when she proclaims to advocate conservative principles and then haughtily throws her support to McCain when she is fully aware of the existence of Hayworth.
Palin has boldly exclaimed "it's called illegal immigration for a reason", then backs the likes of McCain who seeks to circumvent the very laws of this nation.
From SarahPAC.com:
Sarah Palin's Official PAC Dedicated to building America's future, supporting fresh ideas and candidates who share our vision for reform and innovation. SarahPAC believes America's best days are ahead. Our country, founded on conservative principles and the fight for freedom, must confront the challenges of the 21st century with integrity, innovation, and determination.
Palin also has adamantly stated, "being right is more important than being popular".
Popular with whom? Her millions of supporters or the McCain family? Does the latter rank higher in her estimation than does "conservative principles"?
I'm not "torn" in the least over her most recent decision. But someone might want to tap her on the shoulder and gently whisper that a lot of those who support her also ascribe to an oft used adage -
Screw me once, shame on you.
Screw me twice, shame on me.
“You know, politically speaking, if I die, I die. So be it,” she said
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.