Really poor analysis? LOL
I dont mind someone disagreeing but to criticize someone and not explain why they reversed this thing in light of the radical nature of this administration makes you wonder if people like you are any better than the lefties like Gore who say the debate is over with no debate.
Most Freepers know that ls is a published professor of American history. Who are you?
three, I'm gonna go with LS on this one. Your read of the decision was lame.
Let's see .. the conservative majority of the Supreme Court strikes down a law that curtails free speech and somehow it's a conspiracy to give the Obama administration more power.
Really poor analysis.
1) SOROS was never constrained form interference in our elections. The people who were constrained were those who live by law.
2) This is happening now because a few years ago O’Connor retired. We fought Bush and Republicans and Alito was nominated and then eventually confirmed. Since his confirmation every time an issue specific to Campaign finance came before the court free speech has generally won. Had the configuration of the court been what it is now, the entire law would never have passed. It reallyis that simple and indicative of the poer one Justice can hold on the court.
Rush confirmed my hunch that this is a really good decision, and indeed, that your’s was a really poor analysis.