To: gaijin
Thanks for the link to a year of Michelle's wardrobe choices. A few of those might have been shown more than once, but there must have been well over 100 different outfits, of which about 80% I would consider garish, ugly, or poor choices for her physique. And I wonder what the collective price tag would be for those outfits.
And yet we have the press fawning over her fashion style, and even making the outlandish claim that these clothes are inexpensive. If a Republican First Lady dressed like this, we would hear indignant condemnations of both the expense and the style. Further proof, as if we needed it, of the utter bias of the press.
50 posted on
01/20/2010 8:23:38 PM PST by
Steve_Seattle
("Above all, shake your bum at Burton.")
To: Steve_Seattle
Yep. Remember how they hassled Nancy Reagan? She was even hassled by the IRS about supposedly not turning in the clothes as gifts. In a book I read about the Reagans, Nancys clothes were mostly on loan.
151 posted on
01/21/2010 1:36:45 AM PST by
beckysueb
(Scott Brown is a start. Lets keep it going.)
To: Steve_Seattle
If a Republican First Lady dressed like this, we would hear indignant condemnations of both the expense and the style.
That's because, if a Republican dressed like that, she would have to actually purchase the clothes.
226 posted on
01/21/2010 7:49:21 AM PST by
Question Liberal Authority
(Why buy health insurance at all if you can't be turned down for any pre-existing conditions?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson