So Scott Brown voting for taxpayer-funded abortions is the same thing as Ronald Reagan’s inability with a Dem majority in Congress to ban abortions?
It’s a very unique position you’re taking. I don’t buy it at all, but I suppose it could make sense on some level.
Do you really see a difference? Does an aborted child see a difference?
I think both are terrible. But Reagan and Brown are less dangerous to the republic than Mondale or Coakley.