Wrong. From the article:
Has no differences in principle with the socialist minded Democrats;
That is Keyes' claim - do you find it accurate, given that Brown is opposed to amnesty, just for starters?
“Wrong. From the article: Has no differences in principle with the socialist minded Democrats; That is Keyes’ claim - do you find it accurate, given that Brown is opposed to amnesty, just for starters?”
Oh, my.
My, my, my.
Keyes did not claim that Brown “Has no differences in principle with the socialist minded Democrats.”
Here is what the article actually says:
“Scott Brown in Massachusetts is the advance guard for Mitt Romney in the White House (or vice-versa). He becomes the poster child for the RINO clique’s archetypal GOP candidate who:
Has no differences in principle with the socialist minded Democrats...”
Scott Brown becomes the poster child.
It is the RINO clique’s archetypal GOP candidate who has no differences in principle with the socialist minded Democrats, not Scott Brown.
Now, you’ve been calling people liars on this thread. I wonder how you will react to this.
I wonder if you will stretch for a save by saying that, if Brown is the poster child, then every quality of the RINO clique’s archetypal GOP candidate necessarily accrues to Brown.
That’s not true, of course, but I know lots of people who would grasp that straw rather than admit they had misread something.