That's the false choice.
Sure it would be better, but it's not necessarily possible in these states.
Mary Anne Kreitzer makes clear Why I would never support Scott Brown
http://lesfemmes-thetruth.blogspot.com/2010/01/why-i-would-never-support-scott-brown.html
Saturday, January 16, 2010
Suppose you were trying to decide whom to vote for in a Senatorial election. You had already ruled out one candidate, but were considering the other who was great on economic issues. Only one problem — he is a white supremacist who believes in segregation. Do you think you’d vote for him? Heck no! Everyone repudiates that position (which is the politically correct position to take).
(Text omitted)
If I lived in Massachusetts I would not vote for Scott Brown. Why? Because he favors killing unborn children. You can read about his position here. All I had to see was that he thinks abortion should always be legally available and he went straight into the “disqualified” column. Some, who would object to my being a “purist,” (”Don’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good.”) are the same folks who would disqualify outright a white supremicist. Is being a bigot less serious than supporting the murder of the innocent? I don’t think so.
(Excerpted)
The RINOs of the RNC are overjoyed, even though they have only been on the Brown band wagon for three weeks. They got themselves a big strong young white horse in the race. They want to ride this RINO to the White House. Boy o boy! Back to business as usual!
Right, and you'd think we all knew that.
Our due date is 9.17.2010!