Posted on 01/20/2010 9:50:36 AM PST by EternalVigilance
Wednesday, January 20, 2010
(Excerpt) Read more at loyaltoliberty.com ...
Scott Brown is a 0% on what should non-negotiable: the securing of the unalienable right to life of all persons in America.
Brown is not 100% pro Life. He is mostly pro Life in that he supports most of the pro life agenda items such as partial birth abortion ban, parental notification. He is also the 41 vote to kill Obama care which would of made Federal Funding for abortion legal.
To claim that he is "pro choice" because he does NOT agree with you personal opinion on Abortion 100% is intellectually dishonest at best.
Brown is not 100% pro Life. He is mostly pro Life in that he supports most of the pro life agenda items such as partial birth abortion ban, parental notification etc. He is also the 41 vote to kill Obama care which would of made Federal Funding for abortion legal.What he is not willing to do is come out and condemn Abortion.
To claim that he is "pro choice" because he does NOT agree with your personal opinion on Abortion 100% is intellectually dishonest at best.
It is also an example of why your sort of perfectionist dogma is so utterly politically infective. Following your dogam, you would of elected a 100% pro abortion vote to the US Senate because you are too arrogantly wedded to your personal political opinions to actually do the hard dirty compromise work to advace your agenda.
Apparently it is far easier to stand on your stump and scream for perfection,and thus never have to ever actually DO anything, then to actually do the hard dirty political work to fight abortion and save lives.
As Joe Wilson would say, "you lie."
Johnnie, you’re a lying liberal. The perfect poster boy for today’s formerly grand old party.
Are you going to tell FReepers that Martha Coakley is "mostly pro Life"? Because, as has already been proven with links on this thread, Scott Brown said that his position is the same as hers. Was he lying?
. Your total ignorance of Brown's position on Abortion are utterly inexcusable.
While it is true he is not perfectly in step with your personal opinions, it is a lie to claim he is "pro-choice".
http://www.brownforussenate.com/issues
Abortion
While this decision should ultimately be made by the woman in consultation with her doctor, I believe we need to reduce the number of abortions in America. I believe government has the responsibility to regulate in this area and I support parental consent and notification requirements and I oppose partial birth abortion. I also believe there are people of good will on both sides of the issue and we ought to work together to support and promote adoption as an alternative to abortion.
What a load of BS. Brown has not made a secret of the fact that he is pro-abortion. It was right on his website throughout the campaign. He may be a liberal liar in many areas, but in this one he is more truthful than you are.
Are you simply stupid, or do you just think we are?
By the way, Brown helped Romney craft and pass the RomneyCare socialized medicine scheme, complete with its $50 co-pay taxpayer-funded abortions.
Your stupid spin, which was crafted by Romney’s top-level spin doctors, may fool some of the rubes, but it won’t fool informed conservatives.
Instead of responding to every post sent you in under a minute with yet another pre programed dogmatic response, how about you try one time actually listening to what the people here are telling you and engaging them in rational, factual debate for a change?
Sorry if the facts upset the comfortable little bubble world you insist on inhabiting but the facts do not change just because they do not fit your personal purist dogmas.
Simply screaming "Brown is pro choice" then linking to other people screaming the same ignorant statement to validate your own personal dogmas, is a waste of time and bandwith.
How about if you quit lying about Scott Brown’s position? You posted his own language, which is clearly “pro-choice,” or, to put it more accurately, pro-abortion.
Republicans like yourself are the enablers of the abortion holocaust. They couldn’t keep it going without you.
But you posted his own “pro-choice” language.
Like all liberals, you don't debate rationally or factually. You just make it up as you go along and hope there are enough stupid people out there for you to get what you want.
Anybody who votes to allow taxpayer money to subsidize the killing of babies is not "pro-life". What facts did I make up about Brown? He voted for RomneyCare, which includes the subsidy I mentioned, as well as an individual mandate for healthcare.
I await your apology for calling me a liar. You, sir, are the one who is lying about Scott Brown.
Either you are for "we, the people", or against us. There is no middle ground anymore
Let's switch that up a bit, shall we?
Either you are for abortion, or against abortion. There is no middle ground anymore.
Have fun living your life of irony, Johnnie.
“...descendants that carried out the Tea Party would find more in common with Keyes’ politics...”
That is true. Also true that Keyes is not so politically astute.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p8Y2sAdDw98&feature=player_embedded
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.