Would you trade the life of your son for a better economy?
This Friday will mark thirty seven years since the wholesale slaughter began and aside from the Reagan years America has been pretty much on a decline the entire time.
Nobody ever wants to address the fact that, right or wrong, America instituted social programs (mainly Social Security and Medicare) which were formulated with the assumption of predictable population growth. The Baby Boom placed a huge strain on these assumptions; however, this wouldn't be a problem as long as the Boomers reproduced at normal rates. But, they DIDN'T, they MURDERED a generation of 50 MILLION PLUS. So, next time someone brings up the economy or the impending collapse of Social Security and Medicare or the proplem with illegal aliens, remind them that there were 50 MILLION who would be working and paying taxes and buying stuff, etc., but they were MURDERED for the sake of convenience.
The economy is only one of the fronts we are fighting on in this WAR. We are in a war for the survival of this nation. The enemy is the left. They seek to make everyone dependent upon govt for all things.
A better comparison would be to Winston Churchill who during the blitz did not evacuate the cities even though the British had broken the German codes and knew they would be bombed. He needed to win the war and to help in that information was key.
Abortion is a battle we can't win by being absolutist. It's a battle that has to be fought on a lot of fronts among which are tighter restrictions, time limits, parental notification and approval, ultrasounds being shown to mothers before the abortion, etc. If we only support candidates that say no abortions none of the time we can't get a majority to support us.
The question is do we want to win the war a little bit at a time, or lose but have the moral high ground?