Posted on 01/17/2010 9:45:06 AM PST by dano1
A big AMEN to THAT, my FRiend!
This is why I am calling all like-minded FReepers over to the Prayer Thread.
Those of us who believe in the Power of Prayer are doing what we can to combat these spiritual powers of darkness.
Thank You!
Scott Brown is one superb candidate.
And has possibly two of the best ads I have seen in recent memory.
One: He stands in his kitchen and tells the folks, “by now you’ve probably seen the negative ads.” And it usually appears following a triple play of hit pieces from Coakley. It is perfect in the sense that Brown has well defined himself, while Coakley vacationed for a month (and now her message is all negative).
Two: He appears in South Boston (or Dorchester) amid working class voters, i.e. Reagan Dems (hardly the Wall Street types that he tagged with supporting). It’s a great editing job.
I hope Scott sues her heinous to the max....immediately.
That ad will only bring more votes for Brown. Finally the people of Massachusetts are fed up with their Democratic machine.
She is doing what democrats do best...lie.
On his Friday radio show Rush predicted some type of huge smear about Brown over the weekend. Which would give Brown very little time to respond to the lies.
Rush just reminding his listeners about how the game of politics is played.
I’m sure that the Attorney General of the State of Massachusetts (sp?) will look into these serious allegations of law breaking and promptly prosecute any violation of Massachusetts law. I’m sure of it.
I see this pattern in liberals. If they need political leverage they will highjack anyones reputation in order to make political hay.
1. If she's winning, there's no cost at all to simply "withdraw the claim".
2. If she's losing Brown will be the winner, and if she didn't "withdraw the claim" earlier he's going to be pursuing a lawsuit against her as a loser without friends, and a lot of bitterness in the top ranks of the Democrat machine against her because a Senator Brown isn't going to bring home the loot for that party anymore and the best they can hope for is to make him happy.
So, what to do ~ well, looks like she has to "withdraw the claim".
A Republican that fights back. Doesn’t he know that Pubs are supposed to always bend over and take it, so that they’ll be loved on the Sunday news shows?
If you take a look at the goon that pushed the reporter to the ground as Martha Coakley looked on, notice the color of his sweater under his jacket.
Purple Army Indeed.
SEIU is an evil group of unionist thugs. They are making a concerted effort to unionize hospitals in New England, and the head of SEIU said that if a hospital resists, they will destroy their reputation and their relationship with their patients to achieve their goals.
(Note: In my denouncements of unions, I am always ready to accept and point out that there are many in the rank and file of that union who do not wish to be there, but must belong in order to work. We know that circumstance to exist from the pictures of SEIU members who intend to vote for Scott Brown)
One only needs to look at the gross intimidation and slanderous tactics they used against Beth Israel.
To get a good idea of who these despicable people are, what their goals are and who they are aligned with, read this article at National Review Online at this link: "Unholy Union" by Stephen Spruiell
“Nevertheless, the Coakley ad has been sent out, and its timing presents a particularly difficult situation for Brown. The Brown campaign issued the threat of legal action on Saturday, but given that local courts will be closed on Sunday and also on Monday, the Martin Luther King Jr. holiday, Brown’s lawyers could not take any action until Tuesday at the earliest. And Tuesday, of course, just happens to be Election Day.”
+++++++++++++++
a RAT is a RAT is a RAT.
http://www.brownforussenate.com/call-from-home-registration
call tomorrow and freep this.. keep it going ... forget the tricks there are distractions.......
FOCUS........ CALL TOMORROW......
LOL a lying DEM??? Who’d a thunk it???
Question for those in the know about Mass. politics. What are the chances with this stunningly close senate race showing how fed up the voters are, of seeing Barney Frank lose in ‘10?
If Limbaugh or Hannity said the same thing (”I’d cheat to keep those bastards out”) on the Republican side, it would be all over the evening news and the nation’s editorial pages. But only conservatives will hear about these outrageous comments.
Coakley is the witch who recommended a known child rapist(& police officer) to get out on bail!
******
Coakley Coddled Curling Iron Child Rapist Cop
Massachusetts Senate candidate Martha Coakley stubbornly refused to indict a cop who all but admitted to raping a 23-month old baby his niece with a hot object probably a curling iron until the babys mother applied to file criminal charges against the rapist herself.
Democrat Coakley is running to replace the late, bloated drunkard Ted Kennedy in the US Senate. Her opponent in the January 19th special election is Scott Brown, who could use everyones financial help in defeating the rapist-coddling health-care-debacle-supporting Coakley.
Whats worse is that Coakley fought to keep the baby rapist free on his own recognizance after reluctantly indicting him. He only went to jail after Coakleys successor got him convicted two years later.
The Winfield case began Oct. 13, 2005, after a day when Winfield and his wife were baby sitting their niece, along with their own two children.
That afternoon, when the toddlers grandmother stopped by to pick her up, she found the toddler crying, and the child refused to walk. After taking the toddler home, the grandmother changed her diaper and noticed what she could only conclude was a severe diaper rash, according to a narrative of the case detailed in court documents.
******
MA Democrat Attorney General Martha Coakley, her party’s supposedly “best” nominee for the Senate, recommended that a convicted child rapist be released with no cash bail despite the plethora of evidence that he raped a 23-month-old girl with a hot, curling iron.
This...ahem...misjudgment by the then-DA occurred in 2006, but stemmed from an October 2005 case in which a policeman whose union-representative father steered lots of endorsements and donations to the Coakley for AG campaign raped a 23-month-old toddler, also his own niece! This story ought to be front-and-center in the mainstream, liberal media, but it isn’t because it would be too damning for Coakley. MA voters ought to ask themselves, Do we want a woman whose office recommended releasing a convicted child rapist as our senator??
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.