Obama, The Emperor, Has No Clothes(We've Reached The Tipping Point And His Programs Must Be Stopped)

The Philadelphia Bulletin ^ | January 16, 2010 | Herb Denenberg

[Mr. Jeeves]

For example, right from the beginning, early in the last presidential campaign, I said Mr. Obama was a world-class fraud, phony, faker, fibber, and four-flusher and a radical, liberal, leftist socialist, America-hater to boot. Now, I realize that description may sound strong, but it wasn’t strong enough. Mr. Obama is much worse than that.

Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan think he's OK. As long as he remembers to look after the real government's interests, he isn't going anywhere - nor do senior Republicans want him to. They are hoping some day to get the Big Bosses' blessing, themselves, and don't want to set any unhelpful precedents...

[RipSawyer]

I cannot be absolutely certain without further study but a preliminary examination of this article leads me to suspect that Mr. Herb Denenberg may not be exceptionally well pleased with our current president.

And I danged sure ain’t!

[4Liberty]

[fr_freak]

So how is Islamic terrorism dangerous. Only because we let it be. That's an entirely different kettle of fish. Islamic terrorism in an irritant, not a genuine threat. And it's only an irritant becaue we let it be one, out of PC, multi-culturalism and other aspects of our own society, which is the real threat.

Are you out of your g*****n mind? Iran, one of the most fanatical Islamic countries and an active sponsor of terrorism around the world, is on the verge of having a nuclear weapons program, if they don't already. Once they have that, there is nothing stopping them from handing those weapons off to some jihadist yahoo who is willing to set it off in a population center. Seeing as how the USA refuses to implement even the most rudimentary border control in the south (or the north for that matter), it would be a relatively simple task to transport a nuke into Mexico, then up into the US and nuke LA. The only thing stopping them would be the technical proficiency with the device. If they get that far, the rest is inevitable.

The advantage with the Soviet nuclear threat was that the Soviets were relatively sane in comparison and could be trusted not to start a nuclear armageddon which would destroy both sides. Not so with the Muzzie fanatics, including the one in charge of Iran. Furthermore, look how much damage the muzzies wrought with just some box cutters and a few men? Imagine what they could accomplish with greater weaponry. The Nazis and Japanese were, indeed, dangerous, but they were never going to invade our homeland and they didn't have the benefit of micro technology that exists today to implement the level of sabotage that the muzzies could now. The ONLY thing that will stop these nutjobs from attempting this is if they think that, when we lose a city, we'll take out 2 or 3 more of their countries.

The very idea that Islam is a mere annoyance rather than a genuine threat is the most asinine thing I've seen in a while.

[Boucheau]

“...a radical, leftist, socialist politician...”

...a communist...

There, all fixed-up for you.

[Boucheau]

Oh, and if my theory is correct about this Administration, and their many strange international connections, then with all that is happening, an event should take place before the end of March.

This is not supernatural stuff, but I think they will switch to force, or a false flag operation, now that their “soft” measures are failing them.

Tinfoil hat firmly in place, I know, I know.

But I’ve had this “feeling” in my gut for a long time now.

[Tzimisce]

The Obama team apparently thinks the Americans are totally idiots willing to believe brazen, blatant, bold-faced lies.

And there is some basis for this belief, after all Americans elected him. :)

[ksm1]

The Hope-ocalypse begins on Tuesday at 8 PM.

[workerbee]

Regarding next Tuesday, I had predicted a Coakley "win" (a.k.a. steal) by a couple of points, and I'm not convinced the Machine won't rob Brown in the end. But if it does, you really have to wonder what the reaction will be AND if the Commies aren't planning to start some kind of "civil uprising" they can blame on conservatives. I think they've been salivating for a reason to impose some sort of martial law. I wonder if Massachussets will be their opportunity excuse. Would that qualify as a "false flag operation"?

[CaliforniaCon]

RE: “Pitchforks and torches?

Tea Parties?

Or?”

************

All of the above and more — the citizenry has finally had enough and those of us who called out Obama for the socialist fraud he is knew it all along —

Now it’s time to DO something about this worst president ever!

[EdReform]

BTTT

Oath Keepers

Click here to join your State Group

[mojitojoe]

[CincyRichieRich]

Holy crap, was this actually published in the Philly Enquirer?

[charlie72]

Well said. Many of us have been saying what Herb Denenberg has said so well. I also donated to Brown’s campaign. We cannot wait until 2010 elections. Obama may declare martial law. Of Harry Reid, Obama said, “He is on the right side of history.” Actually he is on the left, but the right will win at the end. Whittaker Chambers in “Witness” explained how communists can convince themselves they are the righteous ones even as they kill millions. Have you seen thePostEmail.com/2010/01/12/his-name-is-steve-dunham/
Obama said his name was Steve in a speech in 2008.

[charlie72]

I agree that something is going to happen bad enough to declare martial law. Obama has been groomed for his role in globalization. He will try to surrender our sovereignty (INTERPOL), devalue the dollar, or some other crisis. He will not stop so long as he has breath.

[lakey]

I don’t believe he’s a citizen at all.

Neither do I.

[2ndDivisionVet]

No, it's the Philadelphia Bulletin.

[redpoll]

>>>Hyperbole never helps an argument.

Is Islamic terrorism going to invade, conquer and rule the US? Nope, they don’t have anything close to the capability, despite the fact they would love to do so.

Is Islamic terrorism going to kill hundreds of millions of Americans in less than an hour, as was quite possible during the Cold War? Nope. See above comment.

So how is Islamic terrorism dangerous. Only because we let it be. That’s an entirely different kettle of fish. Islamic terrorism in an irritant, not a genuine threat. And it’s only an irritant becaue we let it be one, out of PC, multi-culturalism and other aspects of our own society, which is the real threat.<<<<

Please allow me to politely disagree. I can see your heart is in the right place, and your thoughts are shared by others.

The mere fact that Islam wants to conquer the West is sufficiently threatening. Communism from the Soviets couldn’t harm the United States in the 1920s, either; it took decades of spying and forced labor to achieve nuclear parity with the West. During World War II, neither the Japanese nor the Germans had the means in 1941 to conquer and subdue the United States. The fact that they sought to do as a long-term goal was sufficient.

Likewise, we haven’t had a megadeath attack from Islam - yet. However, they are planning to do so. The “permission” to use nuclear weapons against American targets has already been “granted” by Islamic authorities. The target death toll I’ve read about was four million, two million of which must be children. That, too, is sufficiently threatening.

I would agree wholeheartedly that political correctness and multiculturalism are also enemies of the American way of life. In that regard, we’re in a two-front war - with Islam from the outside, and with the Left from the inside. I also agree that the Left has gone out of its way to reduce our effectiveness against Islamic attacks.

However, I disagree that Islamic terrorism is a mere irritant. I’m more in agreement with Samuel Huntington in his book “The Clash of Civilizations,” where he points out that everywhere Islamic culture meets another culture there is war. That irritant shows up worldwide, and not just against us, but against all non-believers. An irritant that is not attended to develops into an infection, and then moves on to kill the victim. In fact, that’s one of the strategies of groups like the Muslim Brotherhood - death by 1,000 cuts. A more modern term is asymetrical warfare.

Anyway, please be well, and I hope that I maintained politeness here. It’s hard to tell sometimes when I’m just sitting here typing.

[bravotu]

The very idea that Islam is a mere annoyance rather than a genuine threat is the most asinine thing I’ve seen in a while.
I Need to Repeat the Above and add;

You are sounding like Micheal Moore,,,

[2ndDivisionVet]

See my post #10