Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hippyhater
Look at the article itself (and go beyond the first Webster's definition). The Dalai Lama himself refers to it as a religion...and so does most of the world.

BTW, my comment was not meant to denigrate Buddhism but to make the point that, by comparison, if Buddhism is a religion, so is atheism (defined as a non-belief in God by its secular humanist adherents).

As an aside, much (if not all) of Zen Buddhism fits nicely with the teachings of Jesus.

66 posted on 01/16/2010 9:48:09 AM PST by SonOfDarkSkies (Obama: "Always doing the opposite of what needs to be done!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]


To: SonOfDarkSkies
The Dalai Lama himself refers to it as a religion...and so does most of the world.

True, it is difficult to decide. When I met my teacher he had been a Buddhist for 21 years and he said he still couldn't decide if it was a religion or not. FWIW there are no beliefs that need to be embraced in Tibetan Buddhism.

68 posted on 01/16/2010 9:54:30 AM PST by TigersEye (It's the Marxism, stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson