You of all people, as a resident of the Commonwealth, and one who at least claims to be a Conservative, ought to be the angriest against Democrat agents like Slick Willard (or William Weld, for that matter). The reason why MA is in the condition that it is in is not because of openly-serving Democrats, it’s because the Socialist/Elitist element who differed virtually not one iota from the national Democrats infested the MA GOP and obliterated it, giving the Dems the hypermajorities they have now, well and beyond the real demographics. Yup, that’s right, kids. RINOs made these states a bright shade of Socialist Red (forget that media newsspeak color crap).
I may not be a resident there, but having written about the place for years, MA serves as the ultimate warning to the Republican Party and Conservative movement what happens when Socialists hijack a state party and run out Conservatives... it dies. Again, if you cannot comprehend that and why all of us who can see that as plain as day wish to avoid having that cancer spread nationally (as it has already spread to far too many states already beyond the Northeast, Midwest, and Pacific Coast), you’re either naive, or you DO understand what’s happening and fully support it.
Other than that, with respect to Scott Brown, my points were well made in my prior post and no need to copy and paste them again.
That is not the issue at stake here. You have an obsession with Romney, that is plain, but that is not the issue I am addressing.
The issue is whether you want a candidate like Brown or a candidate like Coakley.
It sounds to me like you wish to have a candidate like Coakley elected. Naive is probably the best way I could describe your attitude.