Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dcwusmc

Defense spending included? How about tax receipts? Government should get out of abortion and marriage? Eliminating Federal and State regulations on abortion and marriage would be conservative? Criminalization of drugs?

See how complex it is?


148 posted on 01/15/2010 4:29:40 PM PST by PugetSoundSoldier (Indignation over the Sting of Truth is the defense of the indefensible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies ]


To: PugetSoundSoldier; dcwusmc
Defense spending included?

Eliminate overseas nation-building and foreign welfare aid.

How about tax receipts?

Stop diverting SS/Medicare funds to all sorts of Big Government boondoggles.

End the income and payroll taxes straight up.

Government should get out of abortion and marriage?

Government should not be allowed to define what constitutes marriage.

Eliminating Federal and State regulations on abortion and marriage would be conservative?

Federal, yes. State, depends on the State.

Criminalization of drugs?

Well, since gluttony is bad, overeating should be prohibited and consumption of food by individuals should be regulated, with certain "bad" foods prohibited outright.

When do we start regulating food?! /sarc

151 posted on 01/15/2010 5:19:03 PM PST by rabscuttle385 (Purge the RINOs! * http://restoretheconstitution.ning.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies ]

To: PugetSoundSoldier

Not at all complicated. Does the Constitution grant FedGov the authority to:

1. Promote baby murder? No, it’s a STATE matter and should revert there. At least at the State level, it could at last be treated as the murder it is.

2. Promote marriage? NO. That should be a RELIGIOUS matter, between the couple and their church and their God. Could the STATES ban “marriage” between same sex couples, children, adults and children, humans and goats? Yes.

3. Ban grown folks (Americans) from ingesting/inhaling things of which the Government disapproves? Not only NO, but HELL NO.

Not complex at all, is it? The CONSERVATIVE position to all the above is, NO, government (especially FedGov) HAS NO SUCH AUTHORITY, period.

Defense spending... well, since defense of our borders is Constitutionally MANDATED, what do you think? Tax receipts? Get rid of the income tax, put FedGov on a diet and then talk to me. Right now 90 percent of what FedGov does, INCLUDING your precious war on some drugs, is flat out UNCONSTITUTIONAL. Shrink government to its Constitutional limits, then we can see what else we want to get rid of.


153 posted on 01/15/2010 5:27:04 PM PST by dcwusmc (We need to make government so small that it can be drowned in a bathtub. III OK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson