Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Big Black and the new bird: the NRO and the early Space Shuttle
Space Review ^ | 1/11/2010 | Dwayne Day

Posted on 01/15/2010 2:19:04 AM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld

Within a year—give or take a few months—the shuttles will no longer be roaring through Florida skies. The program will shut down, the orbiters will go to museums, and pundits and bloggers will jump all over each other to pontificate on the meaning of the shuttle program. Most will declare it a mistake, some will call it a disaster. Eventually the historians will get to it, holding symposia and writing books about the program. Some of them will look at the shuttle’s early origins, when it was slated to be all things to all people: cheap, reliable, responsive. They will look at the early 1970s policy decision to place all American satellites—civilian, commercial, and military—aboard a single rocket. And inevitably they will stumble into what is perhaps the last gaping hole in our knowledge of the shuttle’s origins: the issues surrounding the military and intelligence communities’ agreement to transfer all of their vital satellites to the shuttle. There is not much information on this subject at all, so the recent declassification of several documents that discuss it is a notable development.

What makes these documents most notable is that they are apparently the first declassified US documents referring to NRO policy on using the Space Shuttle. The documents are contained in the most recently published version of a State Department series known as Foreign Relations of the United States (or FRUS for short). FRUS is not the most voluminous source of declassified documents on historical US government activities, and space is rarely discussed in the FRUS volumes. However, FRUS frequently contains very high-level policy documents.

(Excerpt) Read more at thespacereview.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Technical
KEYWORDS: bigblack; nasa; nro; satellites; shuttle; space; spaceshuttle; spysatellites; usintelligence; vandenbergafb

1 posted on 01/15/2010 2:19:07 AM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

My despise meter for this man continues to grow.

And to be honest, I’m beginning to tire of Sarah’s defense of him.

I love Sarah but this man is one of the biggest problems of the Country and of the GOP. There is NO excuse of defending him time after time.


2 posted on 01/15/2010 5:08:07 AM PST by Reagan69 (The only thing SHOVEL-READY since BO's stimulus has been MICHAEL JACKSON (tammy bruce))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan69

Who is “this” man? In the article they refer to multiple people.

Thanks!


3 posted on 01/15/2010 5:23:29 AM PST by SoftwareEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SoftwareEngineer

You are correct. What is he talking about and directing his comment to whom.


4 posted on 01/15/2010 8:44:28 PM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld ("I have learned to use the word "impossible" with the greatest caution."-Dr.Werner Von Braun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson