Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: maggief
Thoughtful and empirical, she views issues like a lawyer building a case.

Just what we need...another freakin lawyer in washington. /mega sarc

9 posted on 01/13/2010 3:28:02 PM PST by GoldenPup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: GoldenPup

Fortunately, the Globe has its own peanut gallery. Some samples:

1. Great decision, Globe.

She knows nothing about foreign affairs (she thinks the Taliban is out of Afghanistan), health care (she thinks the health care bill offers cost savings), or any of the other big challenges facing our nation today.

Maybe you guys should report on the fact that the biggest health care lobby is frantically trying to raise $$ for her in DC so that they can cram this “reform” through?

But she has a “D” after her name, which is all the lemmings need to see.

Your “analysis” and support is thoughtless and shameful.

2. I especially like this line:

“Voters who want to cast a critical eye on Washington without destroying the Democratic coalition should go for Coakley”

A critical eye, you mean the one she had on our corrupt state politicians? You know Dimasi, Wilkerson and Turner? Or maybe the priest who were molesting our children?

3. Endorse her? I thought perhaps you were running her campaign.

Will you next be running an article on how the Taliban is not in Afganistan anymore? If you are endorsing her, I assume that means you are supporting everything she says.

Is there any real fair and balanced journalism left?

**********************

So it seems like a newspaper editor’s life is no longer a happy one, now that the readers can talk back.


12 posted on 01/13/2010 3:45:17 PM PST by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson