Just what we need...another freakin lawyer in washington. /mega sarc
Fortunately, the Globe has its own peanut gallery. Some samples:
1. Great decision, Globe.
She knows nothing about foreign affairs (she thinks the Taliban is out of Afghanistan), health care (she thinks the health care bill offers cost savings), or any of the other big challenges facing our nation today.
Maybe you guys should report on the fact that the biggest health care lobby is frantically trying to raise $$ for her in DC so that they can cram this “reform” through?
But she has a “D” after her name, which is all the lemmings need to see.
Your “analysis” and support is thoughtless and shameful.
2. I especially like this line:
“Voters who want to cast a critical eye on Washington without destroying the Democratic coalition should go for Coakley”
A critical eye, you mean the one she had on our corrupt state politicians? You know Dimasi, Wilkerson and Turner? Or maybe the priest who were molesting our children?
3. Endorse her? I thought perhaps you were running her campaign.
Will you next be running an article on how the Taliban is not in Afganistan anymore? If you are endorsing her, I assume that means you are supporting everything she says.
Is there any real fair and balanced journalism left?
**********************
So it seems like a newspaper editor’s life is no longer a happy one, now that the readers can talk back.