Voodoo practitioners cannot be Christian. They may call themselves Catholics but it is not Christianity. If the two co-exist, the Catholicism has been perverted to something it should not be.
“Voodoo practitioners cannot be Christian. They may call themselves Catholics but it is not Christianity. If the two co-exist, the Catholicism has been perverted to something it should not be.”
Interesting. There should only be one Christian Church.
Since there are hundreds of Christian sects, how do you tell which ones have gone to far into “perversion” to be called Christians? Who decides (on the earthly plane) the qualifications?
The famous Methodist Jim Jones comes to mind. Pat Robertson is a Christian? David Koresh? The Bostonians who burned and drowned witches? The Catholics who tortured “blasphemers”?
CINOs——Christians In Name Only?
It’s a problem for religions and political parties. Anyone can join, and hold any moral or political position and still claim they are Catholic, Christian, Democrat, Republican, etc. Pro-choice Catholics being a good example or the problem.
Did the Catholic Church look upon Martin Luthor’s followers as Christians? When Christians figure out who and what they really are, meaning they require only one sect of Christianity, I’ll consider rejoining, depending on the theology agreed upon.
Christians are a very confused group, imo. (I was raised Catholic, and went to Catholic school for 12 years.)