This is a VERY early developing story so far as I know, but I haven't heard anyone discredit that yet.
“What about that the UIPA request, and the name “Steve Dunham” that was allegedly confirmed by HI as having been born on 8/4/1961?”
“In her official response received by email last night, Okubo denied that there is any index data for a vital record of a birth on August 4, 1961 for a Steve Dunham. It took her 90 days to figure out how to respond. And that in itself lets you, the reader, know what she meant to say: his name is Steve Dunham!”
This person says he did not get confirmation on a “Steve Dunham” vital record with the birth date of 8/4/61. Then the author goes on to say this official denial proves she was right - his name is “Steve Dunham.” I don’t understand why this is being discussed.