It would sound straightforward and simple if someone was simpleminded.....Any person with average intelligence and vocabulary and real knowledge of the laws of Hawaii, would laugh at your "super simple" conclusion.
An MD made the NBC statement, not a staff attorney, and a staff attorney cannot decide for the Supreme Court of the US what is and isn't a Natural Born Citizen when at the least Obama's father was not an American Citizen. You fool no one but yourself.
So tell me why won't Hawaii tell the world the difference between a COLB marked "date filed by Registrar" and one marked "date accepted by State Registrar"? What are they hiding, or are they too stupid or uninformed to know themselves?
It would sound straightforward and simple if someone was simpleminded.....Any person with average intelligence and vocabulary and real knowledge of the laws of Hawaii, would laugh at your "super simple" conclusion.
It's super simple because it is. Most things are and/or can be boiled down to that point...
With this issue (as framed by many here...) it just comes down to these two things...
With "Birthplace" you get that from the State of Hawaii, according to their statement. Or if you don't like that, then you get a state law requiring it for candidates. That's all there is to it.
With "Citizenship of Parents" you have to get a Supreme Court decision for the relevance on "natural born" -- if you want to settle it.
And with those two things -- that's all she wrote... end of story...
[the rest of it is simply all the hollering and screaming... LOL...]