ST has been saying for months that everyone concerned about 0bama’s eligibility is an idiot and that s/he, ST The Great, is very, very busy in his/her home state, trying to get a law passed that will require candidates to prove their citizenship status.
And now s/he says it’s a waste of time?
I don’t get it.
Well gee, it's soooo easy to lie online... I'm sure your last line was sarcasm. There was another After-Birther pushing that same line - it's a talking point or a lying point for them.
You were saying ... Is that proof going to require documentary evidence that both parents were American citizens at the time of birth??? That understanding, that you're presenting here, is disputed among conservatives and others, as to whether that is a requirement. You may think so, but others think not. As far as I can see, this kind of requirement that is spoken about here on Free Republic with a few Freepers maintaining that this is so -- is only going to be resolved by a Supreme Court decision. You're not going to find any legislature that will pass that kind of specific requirement into law -- but -- you will find that state legislatures will have a relatively easy time of passing a law that requires a birth certificate to be shown or else the candidate cannot be on the ballot.
She doesn't mind state legislatures passing laws that all candidates present birth certificates because she knows that the Hawaiian Democratically-controlled criminal syndicate will provide Obama with any piece of paper that he might need to comply with any state law, 50 different birth certificates if necessary.
But she bristles at the thought of the candidate being required to provide proof that both parents were US citizens at the time of birth -- as it is truly Obama's Achilee's heel for which they have no answer. She is probably NS's wife.
ST has been saying for months that everyone concerned about 0bama’s eligibility is an idiot and that s/he, ST The Great, is very, very busy in his/her home state, trying to get a law passed that will require candidates to prove their citizenship status.
Well, I must say that I'm pleased to see that you're still reading my posts. All this time I thought you said you weren't going to be reading them any more... :-)
AND..., I can see what your problem is... it's with reading skills and reading comprehension. After all this time of me posting about this solution, you still don't know what I've said about it... LOL...
What I've said all along and in just about these words is that to solve the problem that many people found out -- which was that there is no legal requirement for a candidate to show his birth certificate -- that we need to get a few states to pass a law that requires a candidate show/produce his birth certificate or else he cannot be on the ballot on that state.
Now, that's what I've said in just about those words, with hardly any variation, when I've been proposing the solution to everyone asking for the birth certificate to be shown.
You really need to brush up on your reading skills... LOL...
And now s/he says it’s a waste of time?
Ummmm..., "reading skills again"... LOL...
Take another look -- as that was another poster that said it was a waste of time, not me. I think that we should get several states to pass a state law to require candidates to show/produce a birth certificate or else they cannot be on the ballot. Obama won't be the last President that we may have questions about, and Obama might retire from the Presidency, after this one term, as far as I know. Some FReepers here have suggested that this might happen.
This is simply a good law for the states to pass, regardless of whether Obama runs again or not. We need it either way.
I don’t get it.
I would suggest brushing up on reading skills and you'll find that comprehension may improve... LOL...