So....what if grades are their motivation? The real questions should be: is the evidence fabricated or not? Is the man guilty or innocent?
The media outlets also filed a brief, arguing that student journalists are entitled to the same protections as working reporters.
I think they will come to regret this position when it
is applied to citizen journalists who after all are no
different than student journalists and in fact are probably
closer to working journalists in that they are published
on the web.
I thought that would be a given, no matter what the school, no matter what the class.
Had they been searching for and found a previously unidentified killer, wouldn't they also be getting a 'good grade'?
Can they also sue Punahou High School, Columbia and Harvard to get grades of someone who went there?
WTF??? Let’s see these prosecutors’ employment performance reviews first. After all, we need this information in order to determine whether their motivation for seeking the students’ information is to bolster their poor work records, which may be putting them at risk of being laid off. And I want to know what law school(s) graduated these sorry excuses for lawyers.
The investigations into old crimes, as part of the Medill Innocence Project, have helped lead to the release of 11 inmates, the projects director says, and an Illinois governor once cited those wrongful convictions as he announced he was commuting the sentences of everyone on death row.
But if the school gives in to such a demand, say advocates of the Medill Innocence Project and more than 50 similar projects (most involving law schools and legal clinics), the stakes could be still higher, discouraging students from taking part or forcing groups to devote time and money to legal assistance.
The students collected an affidavit from a gang member who, they say, confirmed Mr. McKinneys alibi that he was running away from gang members when the shooting took place.
Why are they focusing on these unrelated things? asked Ms. Forte, a defense investigator at the Southern Center for Human Rights who said she went to Northwestern partly to get involved in Mr. Protesss project. I cannot even imagine what they think they are going to find.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/25/us/25innocence.html?pagewanted=all
Anthony McKinney
Chicago prosecutors allege journalism students paid for interviews
Northwestern students paid witnesses, prosecutors allege Professor denies 2 men received money in effort to prove convicted killer is innocent
Two witnesses told investigators they were paid during a probe by Northwestern University journalism students into a 1978 shotgun slaying that the students believe unjustly sent a Harvey man to prison for life, prosecutors alleged Tuesday.
The witnesses told investigators with the Cook County states attorneys office that they were given money in the hopes that their statements would help free Anthony McKinney, convicted of murdering a security guard, prosecutors said in a court filing. The witnesses were identified as Tony Drakes and Michael Lane.
This evidence shows that Tony Drakes gave his video statement upon the understanding that he would receive cash if he gave the answers that inculpated himself and that Drakes promptly used the money to purchase crack cocaine, according to the filing.
Prosecutors also said that students with Northwesterns Innocence Project havent turned over records of two interviews with Lane, who told state investigators he was also paid $50 to $100, but did not sign anything or give information, the court filing alleges.
The Innocence Project is a non-profit legal clinic affiliated with the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law at Yeshiva University and created by Barry C. Scheck and Peter J. Neufeld in 1992
The Innocence Project Board of Directors
Janet Reno Former Attorney General of the United States
Peter Neufeld
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2393/1799185487_d6d75796a0.jpg
Barry Scheck
Barry Scheck and Peter Neufeld, prominent national civil rights attorneys who founded the Innocence Project
The law firm Cochran Neufeld & Scheck, has represented Abner Louima and others who claimed their civil rights were violated by the police or the government. They also served on the defense team for O.J. Simpson.
Please let’s not deify the Innocence Project or this Northwestern University professor.
Why is it that the professor and his students don’t have to stand up to the scrutiny they want for others?
Why is it that the Innocence Project says DNA evidence is exculpatory when the very man who founded the group, Barry Scheck, said DNA evidence couldn’t convict O.J. Simpson?
Let’s get rid of the double standard shall we?
American prosecutors are so corrupt it is sickening.