It is possible for conservatives to disagree on whether on not Obama’s eligibility deserves attention ...but...when DOJ obfuscating, distorting, and deliberately confusing arguments are used to defend Obama, then don't be surprised when some consider who use these tactics to be TROLLS!
It is possible for conservatives to disagree on whether on not Obama’s eligibility deserves attention ...but...when DOJ obfuscating, distorting, and deliberately confusing arguments are used to defend Obama, then don't be surprised when some consider who use these tactics to be TROLLS!
Ahhh...., I think you said this somewhere else, so I'll post my same answer... :-)
But....When so-called conservatives use DOJ talking points regarding Obama’s natural born status, don't be surprised when those defending the Constitution label them TROLLS!
Those talking points that you're referring to may be out there somewhere, but I don't know where they are. If I say certain things that you've heard elsewhere, it's because when I've looked at this -- it's what I come up with just thinking about it on my own and analyzing it on my own.
The statement by the State of Hawaii, of course, is not my own, but that's a matter of an official statement and a matter of record, so that's something that is very important to refer to and is valid.
I just read on another FReeper post, just a few minutes ago, that Clinton said to Kennedy that he was supporting Obama just because he is black. Now, I might come up with that same assessment, but it doesn't mean that I read it from Clinton and I decided to take "Clinton's talking points" from him and then repeat them. It's just that I figured out the same thing myself... LOL...