Replies

You were saying ...

Anyone who wishes nuclear disaster on this country to satisfy your political views is not a welcome debater to me, buzz off!

Well, when you totally fabricate something, like that assertion, you gotta expect a response to that...

You just didn't read my post up above, to another poster, apparently.

The following from Post #300

and the post where she wished there would be a horrible terrorist attack and Americans killed just to make the Dems look bad. Clearly ST is demented.

Well, I don't know for sure if you're demented or not -- but -- I can tell you lack some good reading skills and you also lack some knowledge of what the Bush Administration said, too... :-)

Let me help you out here... so we can get you "up to speed" in a hurry...

As we all know (who have been keeping up on these Islamic terrorists and what our government has been saying and doing about it) -- we've heard multiple times from various Bush Administration officials in the past that it was a certainty that Islamic terrorists would succeed in a massive attack on the United States, at one time or another (but we didn't know when...), something on the scale of 9/11 or greater.

They've let us know repeatedly that this is the case. They've said it's "not a matter of if" but only "a matter of when"... and that they will certainly succeed.

The reasoning that they gave for that is that they've said that in order for us to succeed in preventing such an attack, we have to be perfect in preventing 100% of these kinds of attacks, while all the other side has to do is succeed at "only one such attack"....

The Islamic terrorists can fail 99 times and onlyl succeed one time in this kind of attack, and that's the big one that the government is talking about.

Now, I hope I've gotten you "up to speed now" -- since you've missed that part in the past.

AND..., another thing you may have missed in the past, apparently so, are several threads here on Free Republic, where our government (in the Bush Administration) has been making plans to set up large camps and facilities for handling larger populations that will be displaced from these kinds of terrorist attacks (that they've said they are guaranteed to happen and succeed). These large camps are meant for various kinds of disasters, and not only for Islamic terrorists, but there are being planned right now (and were during the Bush Administration and they were behind schedule in getting those camps completed for rescuing large populations that would be dislocated during any such major attack like they say is coming).

And so, again, another item to "get you up to speed"... :-)

NOW..., since you're up to speed on a few details that you were missing before, let's propose a scenario for you in the attack that is coming and will succeed, as the Bush Administration has been telling us, in the past, when they were in office. I don't think Obama is saying very much about it now, though (as a side-note here).

Two scenarios here... one is that such an attack happens during a Democrat Administration, you know... the one who continually denies the dangers of such an Islamic terrorist attacks and say that the conservatives and Republicans are to blame for these things in the first place.

The other scenario is that such an attack happens during a Republican Administration...

Between the two scenarios of what is going to be happening in the future, I would prefer that such an attack happen during a Democrat Administration and not during a Republican Administration.

Can you imagine what kind of havoc that the Democrats would try to place on a Republican Administration for them not keeping us safe, when such a things happens? I can imagine it... they're pretty good at doing that.

On the other hand, if this coming attack happens during a Democrat Administration, it will force them to deal with the realities of the Islamic terrorists -- something that we need to do anyway, and in any case. The only problem is that the Democrats always block any effective action on this. With this attack that is coming, they Democrats could not block the kind of effective action we need when such a thing happens, with it being on their watch...

That scenario is the preferable one of the two...

I hope you've gotten fully up to speed now... :-)

You were saying ...

To be clear, I do not like you, I despise your posts, contribution's to this site and do not ever want to communicate with you again.

There's a real easy way to accomplish that...

You see..., I don't usually keep up a dialogue with anyone if they "don't dialogue" with me -- doncha know... :-)

What I find, many times, from some in the Obama Derangement Syndrome group -- is that they'll say, "I don't want to talk to you..." and then they'll keep right on talking themselves, back to me (or "about" me...) ... LOL...

I have never figured that one out yet.

So, if you don't talk to me, then I won't be talking to you. But, if you post a thread somewhere, I may post to that thread, just like all the other FReepers will post to that thread. Or if I see something that I might comment on, then I may post a single comment to it, if it happens to be you.

But, overall, I won't dialogue with you if you don't dialogue with me... that's generally the way it works for me.

Oh..., one more thing... I will "dialogue" if I find someone talking "about" me... :-)