Thus a child born outside of Hawaii and attended by a non-Hawaii licensed health care provider or born unattended could get a Hawaii birth certificate nonetheless.”
The only problem here in what you are saying is that not only does Obama get to have a birth certificate from the State of Hawaii, but according to the official statement from the State of Hawaii -- he gets the confirmation that he was born in Hawaii.
And not only does he get the confirmation that he was born in Hawaii (and not merely getting the birth certificate from Hawaii) he also gets a confirmation that he is a natural born American citizen.
Now, if by looking over their records and examining all that they have -- they then come up with the confirmation that Obama was born in Hawaii and Obama is a natural born American citizen... I don't think you're going to find out much else about that, no matter what other things you get from the State of Hawaii...
That quote doesn’t come from me. It comes from the MOTION filed by attorney Hemenway. The State of HI’s doc’s words are worthless. She has no authority to declare anyone a NBC.
Let me excerpt the excerpt for you, Star Traveler:
” ... even though the child was not in fact born in Hawaii but was born outside Hawaii. Thus a Hawaii official might assert that a person had a “birth certificate” that was on file with the state or had been on file with the state but that assertion doesn’t prove that a child was born in Hawaii.”
Leaving aside the birth certificate, and some possible double-speak by Dr. Fukino, she is not authorized to usurp the powers of the Supreme Court of the US to determine who is and who is not a “natural born citizen,” even if born in HI, unless that person’s birth certificate showed that both parents were born in the USA. In the case of Obama, that clearly is not the case. Dr. Fukino clearly overstepped the bounds of her authority in her July 2009 statement.