Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kittykat77
At the time of the revolution, there was NO US Constitution, American law or government. So were they just suppose to write new laws & constitution from scratch? NO, they looked to those they had studied and learned from, the early philosophers & other forms of government and what they chose was the Republican form of government.

You could learn much from reading the commentaries of Justice Wilson, 1791 & Justice Story, 1833.

http://constitutionallyspeaking.wordpress.com/understanding-your-constitution-historical-references/

24 posted on 01/10/2010 6:56:28 PM PST by patlin (1st SCOTUS of USA: "Human life, from its commencement to its close, is protected by the common law.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: patlin
You do know... I was being a bit cheeky there.

Something eludes me here. My question is this: In the 20th and 21st centuries, has the United States government ever differentially classified US citizens on US government-issued visas, passports, military papers, census documents, etc as being either (1) a citizen, (2) a natural born citizen, or (3) a naturalized citizen?

One would assume that if the US government had always intended to maintain a legal distinction between each of three types of citizenship, then it would have established a rigorous system for doing so by now. Yet the US government hasn't. It only keeps track of two types of citizenship.

Why is that?

34 posted on 01/10/2010 8:00:08 PM PST by kittykat77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson