Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Uncle Chip
The Justice Marshall defined it in the Venus decision as early as 1814 and his definition has never been challenged -- until today by the Obotocrazies.

Defined by comments made in dicta, while dissenting the majority decision. They were Chief Justice Marshall's opinion alone and thus are not legally binding. Try again.

154 posted on 01/12/2010 2:16:08 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur
Defined by comments made in dicta, while dissenting the majority decision.

Defined nonetheless -- and defined is as defined does -- and no other Justice has ever challenged that definition or offered his own that is any different.

And it concurs with the definition used in the Senate's SR511 -- Get used to it.

You're wrong. Get used to that too.

155 posted on 01/12/2010 2:26:30 PM PST by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson