Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/09/2010 8:42:58 PM PST by Steelfish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Steelfish

Democrats are funny - they never think the laws they enact will EVER BE USED AGAINST THEM...


2 posted on 01/09/2010 8:46:34 PM PST by 2banana (My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

Let’em change. It will make it that much easier for President Palin to ram through her agenda in 2013.


3 posted on 01/09/2010 8:47:06 PM PST by Lou Budvis (She never bankrupted Alaska or bowed to royalty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

Time for the Gutless Old Party to “reach across the aisle” and beg the dems for some playing time.


4 posted on 01/09/2010 8:47:26 PM PST by 353FMG (Save the Planet -- Eliminate Socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

The irony was that talk radio called for republicans to do the same for judges make it 51, if they did Health Care Reform would be passed last July. Because the moderates (RINOs) Gang of 14 stopped it, they had to get 60 for health reform. Moderate democrats wont dare change the rule now.

I thought talk radio was right at the time but they were wrong.


6 posted on 01/09/2010 8:50:22 PM PST by sickoflibs ( "It's not the taxes, the redistribution is spending you demand stupid")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish
One word.

Political commercial.

Wait, okay, that's two words...

Still, this is good stuff for the 2010 elections (and this is 2010).

.

7 posted on 01/09/2010 8:51:25 PM PST by Seaplaner (Never give in. Never give in. Never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish
It is not the 60 Dem votes they have now. It is the 60 Dem votes they are not going to have after the Massachusetts special election.
9 posted on 01/09/2010 8:58:10 PM PST by gov_bean_ counter (Sarah Palin - For such a time as this)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

Unless the GOP grows a pair, that’s what’s gonna happen.


14 posted on 01/09/2010 9:04:10 PM PST by rbosque (11 year Freeper! The real reason the left wants to disarm us is becoming clearer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

Heh, this simple scumbag Janet Cook (wasn’t she the plagiarist who got fired from somewhere...?) never worried about the filibuster while the Republicans controlled the Senate.


21 posted on 01/09/2010 9:32:24 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

Oops, nevermind. I was thinking of Janet Cooke, the Washington Post disgrace who made up the story ‘Jimmy’s World’ back in the ‘80s. The author of this LA Times column is Janet Hook.


23 posted on 01/09/2010 9:35:47 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish
It takes a two-thirds vote in the Senate to change the rules. That's 67 Senators. If they can barely get 60 for a filibuster-proof Senate, where are they going to get 67 to change the Senate rules?

-PJ

28 posted on 01/09/2010 10:12:50 PM PST by Political Junkie Too ("Comprehensive" reform bills only end up as incomprehensible messes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

I thought the Founders said that the majority couldn’t rule.


30 posted on 01/09/2010 10:40:46 PM PST by wastedyears (If I'm going out, I'm going out like Major Kong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

They have always wanted one party rule. Why do think people keep calling them commies?


31 posted on 01/09/2010 10:42:37 PM PST by GeronL (http://libertyfic.proboards,com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

Where’s the clip of Chuckie Schumer explaining how the Senate is the “saucer that cools the coffee”


32 posted on 01/09/2010 10:51:23 PM PST by ken5050 (Save the Earth..It's the only planet with chocolate!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

bookmark.


33 posted on 01/09/2010 11:16:28 PM PST by IrishCatholic (No local Communist or Socialist Party Chapter? Join the Democrats, it's the same thing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

This is fantastic for the dems. They’ll have easy power and they know Republicans are too cowardly to fight back for the Republic, let alone undo anything that they have forced into place.

It’s perfect for them.


39 posted on 01/09/2010 11:55:12 PM PST by Boucheau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

Democrats are seeking to change the rules.Not true they make up rules as they go along and change them at will.


43 posted on 01/10/2010 2:49:51 AM PST by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

I believe it takes 67 to change senate rules, unless you use the nuclear option. The Gangue of 14 screwed us when we were in power.


47 posted on 01/10/2010 1:28:04 PM PST by CPT Clay (Pick up your weapon and follow me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

Funny, every time you see a liberal lament about the filibuster, they fail to acknowledge that it is Democrats holding up Obama’s agenda. Most outright blame it on Republicans.


61 posted on 01/11/2010 9:16:17 AM PST by IamConservative (Liberty is all a good man needs to succeed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson