“Anyone with any iota of commonsense would have searched a Muslim double agent during a time of war. Period.”
Didn’t happen under that woman’s command, though, did it?
“The CIA’s gender had nothing to do with the sloppiness of not following through with SOP.”
You have no way in the world of knowing that. Your assertion is based on nothing more substantial than blind faith in the PC doctrine of identical capabilities and temperament.
“I can assure you I would have demanded, most graciously”
That you think graciousness is an issue there casts a beam of light on the problem that you insist does not exist.
“The reason I would insist the POTUS follow SOP is for moral.”
Morale.
“And if you think that I do not have the balls and/or know how to handle the “political” requirements of demanding that, well you would be wrong.”
Those aren’t even the right questions. And, again, the fact that you bring up the political serves to illuminate the problem.
Women don’t belong in the military, period, with the exception of nurses. Exceptions can be made in emergencies, but they should never become doctrine.
“You have no way in the world of knowing that. Your assertion is based on nothing more substantial than blind faith in the PC doctrine of identical capabilities and temperament.”
What? You are being illogical. To the best of my knowledge, sloppiness is not a gender oriented trait. Who ever made the decision not to search the double agent was a fool. If you think only women screw up, I am disappointed in your thought process.
The hypothetical search of the POTUS would indicate there are NO exceptions and don’t even bother asking me for an exception. It has to do with power/influence over those you need to control. It has nothing to do with “politics” or a “popularity contest”.