Replies

"It seems to me that the likelihood of having a deranged person walk into a specific classroom and pull out a gun and aim it at a faculty member or other people is quite low," he said, "although it gets a lot of coverage and, of course, generates a lot of passion."

So his "reasoning" is "There's little danger of someone shooting up the place, so consequently we want to abridge people's rights by not letting them carry." How can he justify limiting people's rights to prevent a danger that doesn't even exist?