"While this decision should ultimately be made by the woman in consultation with her doctor, I believe we need to reduce the number of abortions in America. I believe government has the responsibility to regulate in this area and I support parental consent and notification requirements and I oppose partial birth abortion. I also believe there are people of good will on both sides of the issue and we ought to work together to support and promote adoption as an alternative to abortion."
If a candidate for the United States Senate cannot defend our most fundamental God-given unalienable right to Life, then which other of our unalienable rights will he not defend? Will he stand firm against abortionist judges?
Well he could pull a reverse Arlen Specter and move conservative after in office
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find only things evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelogus
In our efforts to build a permanent 51-vote majority to stop all future Sotomayor’s, I’m convinced that Indiana, Arkansas, and Montana are more promising places to elect such senators. It sure isn’t in the cards in looneyTunesAchusetts.
If he loses, and ObamaCare is rammed right through on 60 votes, then abortionist judges will be the very least of our problems, because government will sooner or later be forcing you to pay for other people's abortions.