Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Risk of Catastrophic Victory
Wall Street Journal ^ | January 8, 2010 | Peggy Noonan

Posted on 01/08/2010 6:01:38 AM PST by libstripper

Passage of the health-care bill will be, for the administration, a catastrophic victory. If it is voted through in time for the State of the Union Address, as President Obama hopes, half the chamber will rise to their feet and cheer. They will be cheering their own demise.

If health care does not pass, it will also be a disaster, but only for the administration, not the country. Critics will say, "You didn't even waste our time successfully."

What a blunder this thing has been, win or lose, what a miscalculation on the part of the president. The administration misjudged the mood and the moment. Mr. Obama ran, won, was sworn in and began his work under the spirit of 2008—expansive, part dreamy and part hubristic. But as soon as he was inaugurated ,the president ran into the spirit of 2009—more dug in, more anxious, more bottom-line—and didn't notice. At the exact moment the public was announcing it worried about jobs first and debt and deficits second, the administration decided to devote its first year to health care, which no one was talking about. The great recession changed everything, but not right away.

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: obama; obanacare
Peggy, like the repeatedly abused spouse who still loves her turd of a husband, is gradually beginning to get it about the Illegal Alien, but still won't apologize to her readrs and the country for the horrible atrocity she enabled by supporting him. Now she's accurate about how the Republicanz needing to have a genuine, principled message if they win in November, but can't even bring herself to mention the three great Republican women who will give and are givng that leadership: Sarah Palin, Michelle Backman, and Tennessee's own Marsha Blackburn.
1 posted on 01/08/2010 6:01:39 AM PST by libstripper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: libstripper

Another “moderate” RINO suddenly “getting religion”.

These people are about as reliable as spit.


2 posted on 01/08/2010 6:04:44 AM PST by headstamp 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: headstamp 2

Agreed....Johnny “Come Lately”. And ONLY NOW is OBAMA “getting it”? What is that about?


3 posted on 01/08/2010 6:06:26 AM PST by Blue Turtle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: libstripper
He'd frittered his attention on issues that were secondary and tertiary—climate change, health care—while al Qaeda moved, and the system stuttered.

Good points though. Should be hammered home repeatedly.
4 posted on 01/08/2010 6:06:30 AM PST by mmichaels1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libstripper
What a blunder this thing has been, win or lose, what a miscalculation on the part of the president. The administration misjudged the mood and the moment.

It's only a blunder if looked at from the perspective that Obama wants what is best for America. If seen correctly as an attempt to grease the skids to future tyranny by creating a huge new unconstitutional role for the Federal government, regardless of what happens to today's crop of political actors in the short run, then everything that has been done makes perfect sense.

The political careers of Obama and his party's Senators are small sacrifices to achieve a greater long-term goal.

5 posted on 01/08/2010 6:11:57 AM PST by Mr. Jeeves ("The right to offend is far more important than any right not to be offended." -- Rowan Atkinson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mmichaels1970
If Peggy had only paid attention to what he was actually saying during the campaign instead of joyously sucking all the Obamagaz she could inhale, she'd have realized that Obamacare, AGW legislation, and destroying our ability to fight the WOT were Obama's primary goals, him being an anti-American communist and secret Mudslime who's out to destroy this country. It's nice she's finally waking up from the gaz.
6 posted on 01/08/2010 6:12:57 AM PST by libstripper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

0bama and his entire regime seem to think that they know what’s best for us, despite our protestations. That may be true for the ACORN element of the population, but they will find out that the rest of us do not take kindly to dictatorial tactics!


7 posted on 01/08/2010 6:14:12 AM PST by The Sons of Liberty (Pork Eating CRUSADER - FUBO! Mene, Mene, Tekel, Upharsin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves; All
It's only a blunder if looked at from the perspective that Obama wants what is best for America. If seen correctly as an attempt to grease the skids to future tyranny by creating a huge new unconstitutional role for the Federal government, regardless of what happens to today's crop of political actors in the short run, then everything that has been done makes perfect sense.

You've got it and it deserves repeating.

8 posted on 01/08/2010 6:14:44 AM PST by libstripper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

At what point will the Dim-Bulb Dems realize that Obozo (Muzzie Commie-in-Chief) intends to destroy the United States of America and Capitalism in the West. That includes them. They simply do not understand the consequences of their actions. Their existence is dependent on the survival of the nation. Useful Idiots never get it.


9 posted on 01/08/2010 6:16:15 AM PST by Texas Fossil (Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

You nailed it far more accurately than I.


10 posted on 01/08/2010 6:20:28 AM PST by SueRae
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SueRae

Except some of my spelling wasn’t too good; it’s still early in the morning.


11 posted on 01/08/2010 6:36:24 AM PST by libstripper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Texas Fossil
Libs, and Obama, do not understand history.

Hitler came to power with the help of the Brown Shirts, homosexual thugs who actually led “Crystal Night” vandalism of Jewish shops. Hitler then crushed the Brown Shirts, when he rose to power and no longer needed them.

The Communist North Vietnam did not, always, treat their “Comrades” in South Vietnam very well. After the US Congress lost the War in Vietnam by refusing to fight it -— and by refusing to help South Vietnam fight it -— the North no longer needed its “friends” in the South, and ruled the South with an Iron Fist, usually using NVA and North Vietnamese officials for every important post in the South, for several years after the fall of Saigon.

Obama is a Statist.

When the State runs EVERYTHING, why on Earth does the State want troublesome interest groups around, to complain about how the State is doing things?

12 posted on 01/08/2010 6:47:22 AM PST by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves
. If seen correctly as an attempt to grease the skids to future tyranny by creating a huge new unconstitutional role for the Federal government, regardless of what happens to today's crop of political actors in the short run, then everything that has been done makes perfect sense.

Precisely right. Sure the Dems may be out of power for 5, 10 or 20 years. But as another generational change occurs, the nation will settle in and live with a monstrous and tyrannical health care system that will completely bankrupt the country. It happened with the New Deal. It happened again with the Great Society. And it will happen once more with the Obamanation. By the 100th anniversary of the New Deal, we will complete slaves to a tyrannical government.

13 posted on 01/08/2010 6:51:26 AM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58

Yep, Useful Idiots and Intellectuals are the first to go. No longer serve a purpose.


14 posted on 01/08/2010 6:52:06 AM PST by Texas Fossil (Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Texas Fossil

Peggy Nooner is the ball-less David Brooks. Both should be banished from the Right!


15 posted on 01/08/2010 6:58:06 AM PST by iopscusa (El Vaquero. (SC Lowcountry Cowboy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: iopscusa

“Both should be banished from the Right!”

Never thought of her as Right. Just another pundit. But your observations are colorful, “ball-less”. I have know women who I am convinced had some, but she is not one of them.


16 posted on 01/08/2010 7:01:06 AM PST by Texas Fossil (Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

Ugh. Please don’t give Swoonin’ any hits!!


17 posted on 01/08/2010 12:47:46 PM PST by Mamzelle (Who is Kenneth Gladney? (Don't forget to bring your cameras))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libstripper
If Mr. Obama is extremely lucky—and we're not sure he's a lucky man anymore—he will get a Republican Congress in 2010, and they will do for him what Newt Gingrich did for Bill Clinton: right his ship, give him a foil, guide him while allowing him to look as if he's resisting, bend him while allowing him to look strong.

***

Which gets us to the Republicans. The question isn't whether they'll win seats in the House and Senate this year, and the question isn't even how many. The question is whether the party will be worthy of victory

Insightful article.

18 posted on 01/08/2010 7:58:44 PM PST by annalex (http://www.catecheticsonline.com/CatenaAurea.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

This is the part of the article that deserves the most attention, in my view. If the Conservatives that are Republicans that we end up electing aren’t REAL, honest, and conscientious about bringing the country back to its Constitutional roots, we will end up with a repeat of the Newt “revolution” failure:

“Republican political professionals in Washington assume a coming victory. They do not see that 2010 could be a catastrophic victory for them. If they seize back power without clear purpose, if they are not serious, if they do the lazy and cynical thing by just sitting back and letting the Democrats lose, three bad things will happen. They will contribute to the air of cynicism in which our citizens marinate. Their lack of seriousness will be discerned by the Republican base [and the tea party conservatives!], whose enthusiasm and generosity will be blunted. And the Republicans themselves will be left unable to lead when their time comes, because operating cynically will allow the public to view them cynically, which will lessen the chance they will be able to do anything constructive.”


19 posted on 01/08/2010 8:02:17 PM PST by LTC.Ret (I know I am a racist, but . . . . I didn't spend 31 years in the Army to see my USA turn socialist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson