Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

This is Great News! For Sarah Palin! (Really)
FiveThirtyEight Politics ^ | 1.07.2010 | Nate Silver

Posted on 01/08/2010 1:32:11 AM PST by militanttoby

I find this truly remarkable: in a National Journal survey of 109 Republican "party leaders, political professionals and pundits", not a single one deemed Sarah Palin to be the most likely Republican nominee.

I've written extensive commentary about how I think Palin's chances are in fact pretty decent. I'd probably call her the "favorite", although "favorite" in this context might mean having a 25-30 percent chance of winning. From my list of ten bullet points, this one stands out as the most important:

8. Attempts by the Republican Establishment to neuter her may backfire. This is a corollary of #6 ["She's tough to campaign against"] above. If the Establishment, owing to electability concerns or whatever else, tries to put hurdles in her way by re-structuring the primary or delegate allocation process, it may only play into the victimization complex of Palin and her supporters. 2010/12 is shaping up to be an anti-Establishment cycle. The Republican Establishment is not popular, to a large extent even within their own party, and certainly not among "conservatives" more broadly, only 55 percent of whom have a favorable image of the G.O.P.

Palin has some obvious flaws as a candidate. But she's the best equipped to bridge the divide between the Tea Party and the Republican Party. In some ways, indeed, the "message" that she unveiled in 2008: a mish-mash of populism, everywomanism, and paranoia -- coupled with a light touch on policy specifics -- has proven to be highly prescient in terms of everything that has come thereafter. And most of the other candidates have flaws that are at least as significant: Romney has his Mormonism, his flip-flops, and his MassCare; Huckabee has Maurice Clemmons and is despised by the establishment every bit as much as Palin, and Tim Pawlenty has become the dweeb trying to keep up with the Cool Kids -- we live in a branded world, and in a branded world, the inability to differentiate oneself is death. John Thune comes out looking pretty good, I guess, but he's also the least exposed so that could change.

But back to the point I made in November -- there's going to come a time, probably in July 2011 or so, where the knives are really drawn on Palin and Republican pundits, strategists and candidates start saying in public some of the things they've been thinking in private. And that in all likelihood will play very well for her. Although the Establishment's concerns about Palin's viability as a general election candidate are well grounded, mostly they're just terrified of her because she doesn't need them.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: badromney; jealousromney; palin; romney; romneycovets
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 last
To: ansel12
RE :”...but not by you, big deal.

You care deeply, that is why you kept pinging me with the message all afternoon.

Are you saying all those organizations support amnesty and Cap and trade, or they just dont care about them.

81 posted on 01/08/2010 1:40:43 PM PST by sickoflibs ( "It's not the taxes, the redistribution is spending you demand stupid")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

I’m saying that your posts amount to a lot of childish sniping, and that you ignore what is put before you.

To: aShepard
Well, you’re free to disagree all you wish, but Free Republic is a pro-life and liberty conservative site and there’s no way we’re going to support a liberal RINO for president. If you wish to support a PARTY RINO for political expediency rather than God and country, you’ll be welcome to do it somewhere else.
90 posted on Monday, July 06, 2009 3:24:53 PM by Jim Robinson


82 posted on 01/08/2010 1:57:26 PM PST by ansel12 (anti SoCon. Earl Warren's court 1953-1969, libertarian hero, anti social conservative loser.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

You are childish for pointing out discrepancies that are antithetical to true conservatism. Go spank yourself ;-)


83 posted on 01/08/2010 3:53:49 PM PST by stephenjohnbanker (Support our troops, and vote out the RINO's!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker

How about having Sarah spank me herself ???

:) these Palin-istas are hypnotized. They are the most angry posters here.


84 posted on 01/08/2010 5:10:45 PM PST by sickoflibs ( "It's not the taxes, the redistribution is spending you demand stupid")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

There may be a method to your madness. Palin (and McCain) losing 2008 to Obama definitely revived the republicans, demoralized the democrats and got the independents to forget being mad at Republicans. Maybe your plan is to double down, after 8 years of Obama conservatives will be REALLY motivated. So you plan on repeating that success.


85 posted on 01/08/2010 5:23:57 PM PST by sickoflibs ( "It's not the taxes, the redistribution is spending you demand stupid")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

The discussion has been picked up over here.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2424184/posts


86 posted on 01/08/2010 7:26:17 PM PST by ansel12 (anti SoCon. Earl Warren's court 1953-1969, libertarian hero, anti social conservative loser.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

Thanks! I like #10 the best.

Everyone loves a mystery so everyone can speculate exactly another year driving up book sales with “Will She??” .


87 posted on 01/08/2010 7:36:25 PM PST by sickoflibs ( "It's not the taxes, the redistribution is spending you demand stupid")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

You nailed it!


88 posted on 01/09/2010 5:54:38 AM PST by stephenjohnbanker (Support our troops, and vote out the RINO's!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson