Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

EPA proposes nation's strictest smog limits ever
LA Times ^ | 1/7/10 | Jim Tankersley

Posted on 01/07/2010 4:24:15 PM PST by NormsRevenge

Reporting from Washington - The Environmental Protection Agency proposed the nation's strictest-ever smog limits this morning, a move that could put large parts of the country in violation of federal air quality regulations.

The EPA proposed allowing a ground-level ozone concentration of between 60 and 70 parts per billion, down from the 75-ppb standard adopted under President George W. Bush in 2008.

That means cracking down even further on the emissions from power plants, factories, landfills and motor vehicles which bake in sunlight and form smog.

Obama administration officials and environmental groups say the new standards align with the levels scientists say are needed to safeguard against increased respiratory diseases, particularly in children, and that they could save $100 billion in heath costs over time. The EPA also said compliance costs could total up to $90 billion nationwide.

A 65-ppb standard -- the middle of the proposed range -- would avert between 1,700 and 5,100 premature deaths nationwide in 2020, compared to the 75-ppb standard, the EPA estimates. The agency projects the stricter standard would also prevent an additional 26,000 cases of aggravated asthma, compared to the Bush-era standard, ...

The EPA also proposed setting a "secondary standard" to protect plants and trees from repeated smog exposure during growing season, a move environmentalists said would boost national parks, forests and sensitive ecosystems.

Announcing the proposals, EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson said the agency was "stepping up to protect Americans from one of the most persistent and widespread pollutants we face. . . . Using the best science to strengthen these standards is a long overdue action that will help millions of Americans breathe easier and live healthier."

Environmentalists praised the agency for proposing regulations that match the unanimous recommendations of an EPA science advisory committee.

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: epa; limits; smog; strictest

1 posted on 01/07/2010 4:24:17 PM PST by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge; Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; ...

The list, ping


2 posted on 01/07/2010 4:30:42 PM PST by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

One more step in bankrupting this country


3 posted on 01/07/2010 4:54:20 PM PST by notaliberal (Palin supporter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
A 65-ppb standard -- the middle of the proposed range -- would avert between 1,700 and 5,100 premature deaths nationwide in 2020, compared to the 75-ppb standard, the EPA estimates.

The EPA hired Ian "Fudge Factor" Harris at the University of East Anglia to produce this estimate.

4 posted on 01/07/2010 5:09:08 PM PST by TChad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

OK all you math wizards. How many seconds is this out of hours/years? Compare it. I aint got the math sense to figure this one out.


5 posted on 01/07/2010 5:09:59 PM PST by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

“..match the unanimous recommendations of an EPA science advisory committee”

and the criteria for selecting members of the “EPA science advisory committee” would be ??


6 posted on 01/07/2010 5:10:25 PM PST by Jonah Johansen ("Coming soon to a neighborhood near you")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TChad
The EPA hired Ian "Fudge Factor" Harris...

I think the "fudge" part of it has to do where where they go to get those numbers.

7 posted on 01/07/2010 5:22:08 PM PST by Fresh Wind ("...a whip of political correctness strangles their voice"-Vaclav Klaus on GW skeptics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

The drive to force manufacturing offshore and power out of range of the middle class is forging ahead full steam!


8 posted on 01/07/2010 5:29:44 PM PST by arthurus ("If you don't believe in shooting abortionists, don't shoot an abortionist." -Ann C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fresh Wind

Phony numbers do seem to give off a characteristic odor. The stench from these EPA numbers is overwhelming.


9 posted on 01/07/2010 6:34:14 PM PST by TChad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

The current standard is a miniscule concentration. The new standard is an insignifcant change in that miniscule concentration.
And they act like its a health panacea.


10 posted on 01/07/2010 7:24:08 PM PST by brianr10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson