Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Responsibility2nd

I’m afraid a wise Latina Supreme Court Justicette will find these admendments to be Unconstituitional.

More seriously, this new bill of Right would have to be passed by congress and endorsed by 3/4 of the state legislatures within seven years. Basically, it would be the death knell of the Democratic Party as we know it. They will fight it hammer and tongs, with full support of the LSM. It sounds like an uphill fight.

You also need a constitutional amendment to outlaw Social Security and all its virulent spawn (Medicare, Medicaide, SSI, et) and any thing redolent of public charity or welfare legislation.


16 posted on 01/07/2010 6:54:39 AM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets (The CRU needs adult supervision.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Lonesome in Massachussets

“will find these admendments to be Unconstituitional.”

By definition,,,amendments are always constitutional. At best, a judge can only rule on the laws designed around one. But an amendment can’t be ruled unconstitutional.


34 posted on 01/07/2010 7:10:33 AM PST by DesertRhino (Dogs earn thi title of "man's best friend", Muslims hate dogs,,add that up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson