Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Keep a Civil Cybertongue
The Wall Street Journal ^ | 12-29-09 | JIMMY WALES AND ANDREA WECKERLE

Posted on 01/06/2010 7:33:38 PM PST by GOP_Lady

Rude and abusive online behavior should not be met with silence.

In less than 20 years, the World Wide Web has irrevocably expanded the number of ways we connect and communicate with others. This radical transformation has been almost universally praised.

What hasn't kept pace with the technical innovation is the recognition that people need to engage in civil dialogue. What we see regularly on social networking sites, blogs and other online forums is behavior that ranges from the carelessly rude to the intentionally abusive.

Flare-ups occur on social networking sites because of the ease by which thoughts can be shared through the simple press of a button. Ordinary people, celebrities, members of the media and even legal professionals have shown insufficient restraint before clicking send. There is no shortage of examples—from the recent Twitter heckling at a Web 2.0 Expo in New York, to a Facebook poll asking whether President Obama should be killed.

The comments sections of online gossip sites, as well as some national media outlets, often reflect semi-literate, vitriolic remarks that appear to serve no purpose besides disparaging their intended target. Some sites exist solely as a place for mean-spirited individuals to congregate and spew their venomous verbiage.

Online hostility targeting adults is vastly underreported. The reasons victims fail to come forward include the belief that online hostility is an unavoidable and even acceptable mode of behavior; the pervasive notion that hostile online speech is a tolerable form of free expression; the perceived social stigma of speaking out against attacks; and the absence of readily available support infrastructure to assist victims.

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: civiity; thiswontwork
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last
To: LostInBayport

You think THEY’RE disgusting- you should check out Youtube. You’ll want to take a shower afterwards....


21 posted on 01/06/2010 7:57:30 PM PST by Frank_2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Freddd

I guess it’s okay when it comes to ratings and money, huh?

Maybe that is a reflection of us or maybe that what we’ve become a reflection of.


22 posted on 01/06/2010 7:58:29 PM PST by GOP_Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady

now I just want to see it even more.


23 posted on 01/06/2010 8:00:05 PM PST by RC one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

I sure hope you’re right.


24 posted on 01/06/2010 8:00:48 PM PST by Soothesayer (The United States of America Rest in Peace November 4 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady

During the 1960s and before there were laws enforced against disturbing someone’s peace. In at least some states, the offended could punch insulting offenders in their mouths. We had a more civil society. Then during the last year or two of the 1960s, anti-social individuals—members of SDS, for one (commie hippies), spread a malignant plague of policies for enforcing the offensive behaviors of ugly, little people.


25 posted on 01/06/2010 8:01:01 PM PST by familyop (cbt. engr. (cbt), NG, '89-' 96, Duncan Hunter or no-vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tijeras_Slim; martin_fierro
Flare-ups occur on social networking sites because of the ease by which thoughts can be shared through the simple press of a button. Ordinary people, celebrities, members of the media and even legal professionals have shown insufficient restraint before clicking send.

I was going to say SMN!

But I thought better of it.

26 posted on 01/06/2010 8:03:04 PM PST by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady
Some sites exist solely as a place for mean-spirited individuals to congregate and spew their venomous verbiage.

www.democraticunderground.com

27 posted on 01/06/2010 8:03:12 PM PST by Hardastarboard (Maureen Dowd is right. I DON'T like our President's color. He's a Red.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady
...and the absence of readily available support infrastructure to assist victims.

LMAO

28 posted on 01/06/2010 8:03:43 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Soothesayer

I am certain. I am also certain I wouldn’t want to be them. THey’ve probably done a whole lot else that I wouldn’t want to answer for either.


29 posted on 01/06/2010 8:07:49 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

I agree!

I noticed after you posted your comment that one of the writers was the founder of Wikipedia. (Jimmy Wales)


30 posted on 01/06/2010 8:20:44 PM PST by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RC one

Still, they probably have a lower than average incidence of really serious STDs.


31 posted on 01/06/2010 8:24:31 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady
...the pervasive notion that hostile online speech is a tolerable form of free expression...

WTH? If it's not tolerable (albeit stupid), then expression isn't free, is it?

32 posted on 01/06/2010 8:49:29 PM PST by MortMan (Stubbing one's toes is a valid (if painful) way of locating furniture in the dark.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MortMan

You are free to post so long as the ‘Lady’ does not find it offensive. Just try knocking Romney and see how far she’s willing to allow you to ‘speak’!


33 posted on 01/06/2010 8:51:48 PM PST by MHGinTN (Obots, believing they cannot be deceived, it is impossible to convince them when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady

If you want free speech, you have to take the good with the bad. If you want to regulate it so your finer sensibilities are not offended, you might be a Democrat.

We can plead for polite discourse, but we can’t enforce it without loss of liberty.


34 posted on 01/06/2010 8:54:42 PM PST by Rocky (Obama's ego: The "I's" have it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

I do not make a habit of posting inflammatory comments unless I have the detailed facts to back up the allegations. I do, however, make a habit of challenging stupidly inflammatory rhetoric, if only as a way to sharpen my debating skills. I try to base my opinions on factual information, although I will admit to also trusting my “gut” reactions from time to time.

I detest Romney and his demonstrated history from Massachusetts. I will not and cannot ever support him politically, although he might be suitable in a constrained position supporting a truly conservative administration.

Just my $.02, but still mine...


35 posted on 01/06/2010 9:00:13 PM PST by MortMan (Stubbing one's toes is a valid (if painful) way of locating furniture in the dark.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: MortMan

Allow me to toss an addition $.02 with yours. Mitts formidible business accumen could be useful, though his rinoism should be avoided, always. And i don’t think he’s truthful. He fooled me once on pro-life issues. Never again.


36 posted on 01/06/2010 9:15:30 PM PST by MHGinTN (Obots, believing they cannot be deceived, it is impossible to convince them when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady

I always think of Future Shock when I think of the way we (mis)use the Internet. What it reminds me of is the CB radio craze of the 60’s and 70’s. Here was a tool that had been around for a long time and then seemingly overnight it exploded in popularity.

Suddenly everybody and their idiot son had one and was talking smack on the damned thing. There were rules and an established etiquette but all that was largely ignored by the great unwashed masses.

It’s own popularity was its (almost) undoing. The channels became so unusable due to the pimply-faced morons that legitimate users largely gave up. All that was left was a virtual wasteland of immature idiots swearing at one another at the top of their lungs.

I see a lot of similarities here. We have an excellent set of tools at our disposal and too many of us figuratively use them to prop up the door.

It’s the anonymity IMO. People say stuff on the boards that they would never have the brass to do in person.

I don’t know if we will ever grow into our technology. When I read stuff like what they publish over at DU or KOS I really tend to doubt it...


37 posted on 01/06/2010 9:35:24 PM PST by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rockrr

Several years ago, Yahoo Chat was delightful. After a couple of years, nasty people came aboard and the shredding began.


38 posted on 01/06/2010 9:39:51 PM PST by bannie (Somebody has to go to seed...it might as well be me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Running On Empty

Everyone can put aside some of their restrait and that is the whole point.


39 posted on 01/06/2010 9:50:21 PM PST by JLS (Democrats: People who wont even let you enjoy an unseasonably warm winter day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady; All
behavior that ranges from the carelessly rude to the intentionally abusive.

Uh....that would....uh....be me.
40 posted on 01/06/2010 9:52:10 PM PST by no dems (Sarah Palin has more experience than B. Hussein Obama had.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson