I’m fully aware that of the law regarding legal paternity.
As for the “marriage,” documentation may someday turn up. I doubt it, considering Obama’s effort to pre-emptively explain it away in his book, admitting the details are hazy.
The divorce papers would be necessary, regardless of whether there had been a marriage ceremony, because Ann had been passing the kid off as the son of a marriage (common-law or otherwise) for years.
She needed to establish legal custody. She had plans to marry Soetoro and let him adopt the boy. Can you imagine the hassle of getting Sr.’s signature on all the paperwork required, both in Hawaii and Indonesia, for adoption, citizenship, school, etc. if the court had not awarded her sole custody? She was just taking care of business.
“She needed to establish legal custody. She had plans to marry Soetoro and let him adopt the boy. Can you imagine the hassle of getting Sr.’s signature on all the paperwork required, both in Hawaii and Indonesia, for adoption, citizenship, school, etc. if the court had not awarded her sole custody? She was just taking care of business.”
When you take this ONE thing only into account, how can it be so difficulty for a few here and the media outlets, including the three government branches to understand that everything in this treasonous impostor’s life-records have been totally sanitized for us to see???
And the hypocrisy of double standards is just mind-boggling!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJ6iLuyCAx0
Of course, if Obama Sr. and Stanley Ann were never legally married, then there's no question of his holding British citizenship. Until very recently, Britain didn't grant citizenship to the children of unmarried British fathers and non-British women.