Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

David Rivkin Appears On MSNBC, Builds Economic Case For Profiling In Airports
OfficialWire ^ | 1/6/2010 | Brent Baldwin

Posted on 01/06/2010 8:36:00 AM PST by The Doctor

Former Reagan Justice Department official David Rivkin appeared live on MSNBC’s “Hardball with Chris Matthews” to discuss increased airport profiling measures in the wake of the Christmas Day attempted terrorist bombing of Flight 253 to Detroit.

“It’s a reasonable way to go …. with profiling, let’s leave aside political correctness,” Rivkin told host Chris Matthews. “It’s a way of marshaling scarce resources to manage a large threat.” The Transportation Security Administration has increased inbound flight screening measures in 14 foreign countries of origin including: Afghanistan, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Cuba, Libya, Pakistan and Nigeria. Rivkin noted that the real question was whether this was the right way to profile.

“I frankly think we need to look at other factors: We need to look at age, we need to look at gender …. but we shouldn’t be blinded by it,“ he added.

Rivkin asserted that the profiling process should be combined with other measures and worked “from beginning to end” of the transportation process. “Selecting people, checking people, making sure they don’t get through if they are carrying some suspicious objects, you need to do it all,” Rivkin said.

Joining Rivkin on the broadcast was Alejandro Beutel of the Muslim Public Affairs Council, who offered a counterargument that behavioral profiling was more useful, while agreeing with Rivkin that there should be a “layered defense.” Matthews took the side of Rivkin, also admitting our lack of resources and pointing out to Beutel that it was simply “common sense” to profile based on countries of origin.

“I’m not against nuanced behavioral profiling but we don’t have the resources for it,” Rivkin said. “If we push Al-Qaeda to stop recruiting [from these countries] … this is what you do in warfare, you push your enemy to operate in less than optimal ways. I would bet they won’t be able to recruit enough Scandinavians [to counter profiling measures].”

Rivkin told Beutel that he was wrongly worried about broader groups being stigmatized. “We don’t do that in this country,” Rivkin said. “All we are talking about is allocating resources, not stigmatizing.”

About David Rivkin David Rivkin is an attorney in private practice and partner at Baker & Hostetler in Washington, D.C., who has had a lengthy career distinguished by service in the White House during two presidents’ terms, in the U.S. Department of Justice and in the U.S. Department of Energy. He is a well-known writer and media commentator on matters of constitutional and international law, as well as foreign and defense policy. He is a visiting fellow at the Nixon Center, contributing editor at the National Review, and a member of the Advisory Council at National Interest magazine. He currently serves as co-chairman of the Center for Law and Counterterrorism at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies. He also represents foreign governments and corporate entities on legal, political, defense, economy and public relations matters.

For more information, visit www.davidrivkin.com


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: airports; profiling; security; terrorism
Again, David Rivkin seems to have hit the nail on the head here. I hope that our current administration starts allocating the resources needed to engage in "nuanced behavioral profiling". Until then, the blunt instrument of racial profiling is the only thing we've got.
1 posted on 01/06/2010 8:36:03 AM PST by The Doctor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: The Doctor
The first politician who calls for the profiling of Muslims - a common-sense solution - will jump 10% in approval polls, despite party affiliation.
2 posted on 01/06/2010 8:57:00 AM PST by Dansong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Doctor
“It’s a reasonable way to go …. with profiling, let’s leave aside political correctness,” Rivkin told host Chris Matthews. “It’s a way of marshaling scarce resources to manage a large threat.” The Transportation Security Administration has increased inbound flight screening measures in 14 foreign countries of origin including: Afghanistan, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Cuba, Libya, Pakistan and Nigeria.

It's a reasonable way to go ... . with profiling, let's use common sense and the science of statistical analysis.

3 posted on 01/06/2010 10:02:02 AM PST by olezip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Doctor
Agreed, but the problem is that the real threat comes from Muslims in Europe - that's where the renewed Bojinka Plot originated, in the UK.

Screening only for Muslims from Muslim majority countries will be fighting only the most recent batttle in this Long War.

4 posted on 01/06/2010 10:51:11 AM PST by happygrl (Hope and Change or Rope and Chains?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson