Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ohioWfan
He was always stellar with the troops, and extremely popular with them as a result. His support of the military was wonderful.

It was his lack of ongoing explanation to the American public (that needed it very much) and his unwillingness to engage his political enemies I am objecting to.

I understand his reasoning, just don't agree with it. Franklin Roosevelt understood that part better.

108 posted on 01/05/2010 12:53:08 PM PST by Lakeshark (Thank a member of the US armed forces for their sacrifice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]


To: Lakeshark
I completely agree that he didn't engage his political enemies, and that hurt, but I will continue to disagree that he didn't offer explanations to the American people.

He did. They didn't want to hear them. And after 8 years of incessant beating and constant lies by his political enemies (including, of course, the 'impartial' press that hated him with a deep passion and denied the American people the right to hear what he was saying), and the shameful weakness of the Republicans who should have been supporting our troops and their Commander in Chief, but were too afraid, he was unable to recover from the blows to his poll numbers.

Fortunately, time WILL allow the truth to be made known, and those lies will be replaced with the truth.

115 posted on 01/05/2010 1:07:29 PM PST by ohioWfan (Proud Mom of a Bronze Star recipient!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson