Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HiTech RedNeck
The body scan looks not for chemicals but for objects.

Although I do not know the actual technology except I guess it involves XRays, I have seen two reports this week that say the current scan technology (or at least what they are planning on using) cannot reliably detect what the crotch bomber was using.
7 posted on 01/05/2010 12:49:04 AM PST by microgood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: microgood
"Although I do not know the actual technology except I guess it involves XRays, I have seen two reports this week that say the current scan technology (or at least what they are planning on using) cannot reliably detect what the crotch bomber was using."

It uses long-wavelength radio waves, so it's more analogous to ultrasound, so yes it is "like" X-rays in that it penetrates clothing, but uses much safer radiation to do so. and the way it "detects" the explosive is to allow you to "see" in the computer generated image that the passenger has a strange item taped to his groin.

Actual detection of the explosive itself is done by chemical instruments that can identify very tiny amounts of specific chemicals. You step into a booth that pulls a volume of air around you, and said air is fed to the instrument. If the person has on their body (or has handled) an explosive compound, at least a few molecules WILL be in that air, and will be detected.

Both technologies should be used, but they ain't cheap.

16 posted on 01/05/2010 3:57:08 AM PST by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson