Skip to comments.
New Hampshire proposes state sovereignty law--with a twist
St. Louis Gun Right Examiner ^
| January 1, 2010
| Kurt Hofmann
Posted on 01/03/2010 11:23:21 AM PST by Still Thinking
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
The bill also fails to exempt NFA items such as machine guns, silencers and so on, as do the bills passed in MT and TN.
To: Still Thinking
2
posted on
01/03/2010 11:27:09 AM PST
by
Errant
To: Still Thinking
For us dum dums (Me, Inc) is that good or bad?
3
posted on
01/03/2010 11:27:13 AM PST
by
ROTB
(Public Option vs. Insurance: Armed men at my door demanding payment vs a "bill")
To: ROTB
Depends on if one is in favor of the federal government going back to the relatively small box described for it in Obama’s toilet paper (the Constitution). If you are, this is a good thing.
4
posted on
01/03/2010 11:29:25 AM PST
by
Still Thinking
(Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
To: Still Thinking
New Hampshire? The liberal, northeastern New Hampshire??
Wowser.
To: Still Thinking
Silencers I can probably live without, but it is the “and so on” I am worried about.
.....Bob
6
posted on
01/03/2010 11:31:14 AM PST
by
Lokibob
(When handed lemons...Refuse to sign for them. Life's lemons can't be delivered without a signature.)
To: Still Thinking
To: Still Thinking
The sad part is that, from the 13’th Amendment on, the role of the federal government became able to intervene within the states, thus making them nothing more than provincial jurisdictions of the federal government. Look at medical marijuana laws. That’s a state’s matter and it took a lib-tard like Obama to do what Bush should have done: order his agents to leave the states alone in their decision to allow medical marijuana dispensaries. Whether you agree with marijuana legalization or not, it’s not up to the feds to stick their noses into unless it crosses states’ lines, and - even then - only if the other state affected complains. The same is true for guns within these few brave states.
8
posted on
01/03/2010 11:32:12 AM PST
by
Engineer_Soldier
(Capped this decade my joining three gun groups in one hour...Rocky Mountain Gunowners, GOA, and NRA!)
To: ROTB
If they get it passed, and if they stick to their guns-in the face of all sorts of potential threats from the Feds for going off the reservation-that's real good!
9
posted on
01/03/2010 11:32:30 AM PST
by
skimbell
To: Still Thinking
10
posted on
01/03/2010 11:33:04 AM PST
by
Enterprise
(When they come for your guns and ammo, give them the ammo first.)
To: Recovering_Democrat
Actually, NH is pretty conservative for New England, the only state that consistently went (R) in Presidential elections. Liberal refugees from MA however, who think that continuing to vote for the same tyrants and policies they did in the state they escaped from, are causing NH to trend stupid.
11
posted on
01/03/2010 11:34:36 AM PST
by
Still Thinking
(Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
To: Recovering_Democrat
NH is not liberal
it’s been infested by libs from Mass but in general it is conservative
To: Lokibob
No, no, you misunderstood. The laws passed in MT and TN, and for all I know, the ones being considered in other states, don’t exempt intrastate silencers, machine guns and so on from federal control. This bill differs in being MORE aggressive in that respect.
13
posted on
01/03/2010 11:36:26 AM PST
by
Still Thinking
(Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
To: Still Thinking
What is the outlook for this being passed and signed into law?
Thought NH was suffering a continued infestation from the south
14
posted on
01/03/2010 11:37:13 AM PST
by
SuperLuminal
(Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
To: Still Thinking
What is the outlook for this being passed and signed into law?
Thought NH was suffering a continued infestation from the south
15
posted on
01/03/2010 11:37:20 AM PST
by
SuperLuminal
(Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
To: Enterprise
Uh, why is Mr. Burns standing in front of a map of Europe?
16
posted on
01/03/2010 11:37:49 AM PST
by
Still Thinking
(Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
To: SuperLuminal
What is the outlook for this being passed and signed into law?Don't know. I don't live there, just saw this posted online. According to the comments at the article page, a state sovereignty bill was defeated by a single vote last year. Don't know if that one was firearms related or if it was, if it had this provision.
17
posted on
01/03/2010 11:40:35 AM PST
by
Still Thinking
(Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
To: Still Thinking
"Uh, why is Mr. Burns standing in front of a map of Europe?" Because the NH proposal is a slap at the New World Order.
18
posted on
01/03/2010 11:43:40 AM PST
by
Enterprise
(When they come for your guns and ammo, give them the ammo first.)
To: Enterprise
19
posted on
01/03/2010 11:44:33 AM PST
by
Still Thinking
(Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
To: bamahead; ForGod'sSake; Eric Blair 2084
Shout out to the pro-Constitution and anti-nanny crowd.
20
posted on
01/03/2010 11:45:39 AM PST
by
Still Thinking
(Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson