Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lower55; NoRedTape
A good analogy would be you get in your car to drive home. On the way home you get a cellphone call informing you five separate people had stolen your car earlier in the day. You continue driving home in your car and find out 3 more people had stolen your car in the interim.

While you were sleeping later that night, with your car safely in your garage, 18 different people stole your car. In the morning you get in your car and drive to work again.

gitmo

54 posted on 01/03/2010 11:45:22 AM PST by gitmo (FR vs DU: n4mage vs DUmage)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: gitmo
There's not anything quite like what's happened with music. We can debate about what's right and wrong, but the simple fact is "what is." Music is easily reproducible, and there's no way to copy protect it. Copy protection of downloadable songs simply moves people towards pirating.

Copyrighting was originally intended to protect artists, but has become a method to enrich lawyers and corporations. As an example, Hank Williams has been dead for nearly sixty years, but lawyers still make money off his music. What if a hammer manufacturer demanded a royalty off every nail driven with a hammer? That's what copyright has become.

57 posted on 01/03/2010 12:11:32 PM PST by Richard Kimball (We're all criminals. They just haven't figured out what some of us have done yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

To: gitmo
"A good analogy would be you get in your car to drive home. On the way home you get a cellphone call informing you five separate people had stolen your car earlier in the day. You continue driving home in your car and find out 3 more people had stolen your car in the interim. While you were sleeping later that night, with your car safely in your garage, 18 different people stole your car. In the morning you get in your car and drive to work again."

But, did you build the "car" and have to pay others for producing and marketing the "Car"? The "car" in your scenario was not stolen, it was copied, or reproduced. There is still value in the reproduction; same cost and value as was put into the original.

Same with songs and software. They cost money to produce and to market. Why should they be allowed to be stolen? They are produced to be sold; not just given away, unless the manufacturer or artist decides to do so.

60 posted on 01/03/2010 12:42:51 PM PST by NoRedTape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

To: gitmo

“A good analogy would be you get in your car to drive home. On the way home you get a cellphone call informing you five separate people had stolen your car earlier in the day. You continue driving home in your car and find out 3 more people had stolen your car in the interim.

While you were sleeping later that night, with your car safely in your garage, 18 different people stole your car. In the morning you get in your car and drive to work again.”

Silly analogy.....A better one would be people taking pictures of your car.


63 posted on 01/03/2010 4:12:56 PM PST by Lower55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson