Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: reaganaut; GOP_Lady
You quoted the retread troll saying this. I don’t hold him lying to the liberals in Massachussets so they would elect him against him,

An important correction to the troll's clumsy claim, is that Romney was not lying about his heartfelt politics during the 1994 or 2002 elections, Romney has a very clear, liberal political history before then.

Romney was giving money (solely) to democrat races, and fund raising solely as a democrat, just before he registered as a republican in late 1993.

344 posted on 01/06/2010 9:44:20 AM PST by ansel12 (anti SoCon. Earl Warren's court 1953-1969, libertarian hero, anti social conservative loser.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 313 | View Replies ]


To: ansel12; quietcontrarian

Oh, I know Romney wasn’t lying then. My point was that the retread implied it is OK to lie to further your goals (like getting elected).

And it would not surprise me in the least if Mitt continues to lie to conservatives to get the nom. It is part of his culture/history in many ways. “Lying for the Lord” is acceptable in some circles.

The last thing we need is ANOTHER liar in office.


357 posted on 01/06/2010 12:59:21 PM PST by reaganaut (Former Mormon, now Christian "I once was lost but now am found, was blind but now I see")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 344 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson