I have only stated facts here in response to people castigating him for supporting Brown, etc. while these people at the same time hold DeMint in such high regard while DeMint supported Mitt with great enthusiasm and has Mitt Romney help him currently.
As far as 2012, I like Mitt so far more than Huckelberry, Palin, and Pawlenty, but would rather have a better candidate who is a little sharper and has a little more intellectual depth. Know anyone?
I don't hold him lying to the liberals in Massachussets so they would elect him against him, but I do dislike him pointing to his plan in MA as a point of success rather than as the best deal he could get out of a Communist state legislature.
Sorry I can't respond with the same hysterics that people have been shooting at me. I'm just an honest dealer here.
So, quietcontrarian, RomeyBOT, says lying is A-OK,
consistent with Romneys endless lies; but quietcontrarian ignores
that Romney lied to the Conservatives, and not the liberals.
Romney serves all liars, fakers, phoneys, including the DNC.
Romney aides bogus badges: Sources detail illegal security tactic
" Boston Herald - Friday, July 20, 2007
In an apparent violation of the law, a controverisal aide to ex-Gov. Mitt Romney
created phony law enforcement badges that he and other staffers used on the campaign trail
to strong-arm reporters, avoid paying tolls and trick security guards
into giving them immediate access to campaign venues, sources told the Herald.
They (the aides) knew the badges were fake and probably illegal,
said a presidential campaign source who asked for anonymity
because the story could damage the individuals career.
Two additional sources confirmed that the badges - described as bright silver plates with a state seal attached -
were first created and used by Garrity while Romney was still governor."
FAKE TROOPER (and Chief of Operations)
More here - Romney aide is the focus of probe
Romney aide accused of faking badges
Your protests ring hollow. To lump Palin in with Huck and Pawlenty is self-deceptive at best. And PLEASE tell us what value "a little more intellectual depth" would be?
I think that you are reaching for any reason you can to reject Palin. You look a gift horse in the mouth -- we have had a gift delivered right to us, and you turn your nose up at it.
Well on this thread it is Romney that you are trying to defend, why dont you elaborate on why you support Mitt Romney, surely you have something more than just telling us about DeMint?
I don’t hold him lying to the liberals in Massachussets so they would elect him against him,
- - - - —
So lying is OK, as long as it furthers your goal????
Google “Lying for the Lord”, it fits in with what Romney did to get elected in MA.