[LuvFreeRepublic]

It seems that you have an agenda and it has nothing to do with defending Rush or exposing the media bias. If true, pretty sorry state of affairs when someone uses what could have been a serious health problem of a beloved person to trash someone who has had problems, but by all accounts, is someone to be admired by those who don't have an agenda.

[fightinJAG]

Sorry. I disagree, no big deal about that and nothing “sad” about it. It’s just a disagreement.

I do not think that Brett Favre is someone to be admired, so I don’t admire him. But if you do, that’s fine by me.

I was with him until he treated the Green Bay Packers like a spoiled brat. He could have done everything he did, including “un”-retire numerous times, and still have given appropriate props to the fans and the team.

Again, nothing “sad” about it. And it’s not an “agenda.” It’s just my opinion and considered judgment, and I’ve stated it openly. But more than that, this thread was about the very fact that the media goes out of its way to try to disparage Rush when it also goes out of its way to forgive and forget the transgressions of people of whom it approves.

I’m defending Rush here. That is all.