To: olrtex; saganite; PugetSoundSoldier; slowhandluke
-
.. . . if the fraction decreased by 5% during the first 100 years of that 150 years and then increased by 1% during the last 50 years of that 150 years, wouldn't you have a situation where the fraction has not increased in the last 150 years, but HAS increased in the last 50? .....Yes, I was wrong in my statement; the fraction could indeed have remained constant or decreased over the last 150 years, but increased during the last 50 years.
I opined in haste.
You see, I was startled by what I thought was a snake in the grass in the form of a hockey stick, and I lashed out in reactionary fear and disgust. (I also shout epithets at newscasts and liberals on C-SPAN)
I despise hockey sticks.
64 posted on
01/01/2010 3:55:45 PM PST by
skeptoid
(AE, AA, BSPHD (with clusters))
To: skeptoid
.. . . if the fraction decreased by 5% during the first 100 years of that 150 years and then increased by 1% during the last 50 years of that 150 years, wouldn't you have a situation
where the fraction has not increased in the last 150 years, but HAS increased in the last 50? Yes, I was wrong in my statement; the fraction could indeed have remained constant or decreased over the last 150 years,
but increased during the last 50 years.
I opined in haste.
You see, I was startled by what I thought was a snake in the grass in the form of a hockey stick, and I lashed out in reactionary fear and disgust.
(I also shout epithets at newscasts and liberals on C-SPAN)
I despise hockey sticks.
65 posted on
01/01/2010 4:04:27 PM PST by
skeptoid
(AE, AA, BSPHD (with clusters))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson