The only reason they got away with it in Alaska was due to the state laws. Most states have different laws that would not have allowed her to be sued to that point. That includes any office in the feds, including the office of President.
It is plain to see you have no idea what the F*** you are talking about. Don't let that stop you though, just keep on running your mouth and showing your total ignorance of what really went on in Alaska.
The only reason they got away with it in Alaska was due to the state laws. Most states have different laws that would not have allowed her to be sued to that point. That includes any office in the feds, including the office of President.So what happens next time she annoys some Democrat hacks? They sue, frivolously, and she quits, again?
Like I keep tellin’ FR’s Sara-philes, I just ain’t impressed.Count me as a "Sara-phile" who is aware of the fact that Palin's "good government" cred was not unrelated to ethics reform which she herself naively championed but which opened up the Alaska government to Alinskyite harassment. Recognition of that was one of the things that I looked for, and found, in Rogue.So we have in Palin a late-blooming politician who does not grasp at the perquisites of office and sincerely believes in good government - but is properly chastened by direct personal experience with ethics laws which are open to cynical abuse. I wanted to believe that Palin had learned from her experience, and I am satisfied that she has.
- - - - - - - - - To be realistic about presidential timber, no senator has ever unseated a sitting president, and only one - Harding - has ever defeated a former governor. And no one who has not attained national office within 14 years of attaining a governorship or a senate seat has been elected president.
That of course means that nominating McCain, Kerry, or Dole was a fool's errand from the start. And that realistic Republican candidates for the presidency can be counted on the fingers of one hand. And none stands taller than Palin. The unconstitutional "Campaign Finance Reform laws" disadvantage a Sarah Palin or a Ronald Reagan (who wouldn't have run for office if McCain-Feingold had been in effect at the time). So I say, we shouldn't wait for her to declare candidacy - we need serious a "Draft Palin" movement.
I need to read her book (wild horses couldn’t pay me to read any politician’s book), I need to do more research, I don’t understand Alaskan law, etc. Is that it?
Maybe Sarah should have read a book or two. Maybe she should have done more research before swearing an oath to govern Alaska. Had she understood Alaskan law better, maybe she’d have known better, or maybe she’d have been prepared for frivolous ethics charges and a lawsuit-bankcruptcy attack from Democrat hacks? Just like she might have done a little more reading and listening (and thinking?) and been better prepared for attack interviews from Gibson and Couric?
And y’all still aren’t answering my question. What happens next time she annoys some Democrat hacks? They find a new, frivolous angle to sue, frivolously, and a frivolous Democrat judge frivolously sees merit in the case? And she’s not as prepared as she might have been, and didn’t expect such hatred and viciousness, and, for the sake of her family and of the voters of America, she quits, again? Wagerers, what odds will you give me?
Thanks to those who’re trying, politely and rationally, to show me where I’m wrong, and to those few who aren’t so polite or rational, thanks for the CAPITAL-LETTER internet yelling and for the asterisk-ized swearing. Sarah’s people is as Sarah’s people does, hayna?