[LomanBill]

[Frischling wrote on his blog that he decided to publish the TSA directive to clear up much of the confusion and speculation that was circulating among the public about changes that were being instituted in airport security procedures]

 

Hmmm.  Ya s'pose he might of cleared up a bit of "confusion and speculation" for potential terrorists as well; potential terrorists who already train to game the TSA systems?

 

Would that be a good thing?

[rolling_stone]

Hmmm. Ya s'pose he might of cleared up a bit of "confusion and speculation" for potential terrorists as well; potential terrorists who already train to game the TSA systems?

Would that be a good thing?

I agree that helping terrorists is not in our best interests. I also feel that the directive was a stupid reaction to a problem, and in fact was only partially responsive to the incident. The government as usual uses a shotgun approach to stopping an ant when a more pinpointed method would be more effective. I believe legitimate profiling and denying visas is in order, this political correct stuff is garbage. We are dealing with mentally ill fanatics bent on destroying themselves and the USA and more responsive methods should be employed. (I'm not talking about socialists this time). If no Air Marshalls are allowed on Amsterdam flights, then no flights from Amsterdam should land in the USA period. I want to know if the terrorist had a passport or not when he boarded the airplane.