Replies

Really now, *sigh* less than honest in your reply

Is that stating that " 'life' is part of the Einstein theory of realtivity."? Nope.

Your reply clearly stated "light, life and matter are one and the same" which was "confirmed by Einstein" - Strike one

And did you read Feynmans chapter on Relativity

Feynmans' chapter was titled "Special Theory of Relativity", created by - Einstein. Strike two

The question still stands and makes no reference to Einstein either.

Have you forgot what the term "context" means, Foul tip

Oh, I see you conviently left off this one

#225 - (GZ)"I have only asked one question, not 20, and that is to point me to the scientific journals/articles/books that specifically link “life” to Einstein’s relativity equation."
(LG) "And I replied by asking you what is different in 'life' to make Einsteins equation not applicable to it? "

Probably the most damning one of all which totally sinks your claim, now found to be not only baseless, but intellectually dishonestly defended too. Strike 3.

Boy, you can easily go back and see that I was making the point that everything is a wave function. Cherry picking and leaving parts of quotes out doesn't help your case.

Oh, incase you forgot your challenge was your claim of life being a component in Eistein's relativity equations - Please leave the field with what little honor you can still muster.

Just point out the differences at the wave function level between Life and/or Energy and/or matter and/or carbon chains and/or photons, etc. and I will be happy to give you references proving you wrong : )

Still waiting for the references to show that life is a component of Einstein's laws of relativity and special relativity.

Absolutely everything is a wave function.

Brush up on your wave functions skippy - not applicable to anything larger than the smallest bacteria. You are dismissed for the day.