Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Titus-Maximus

I saw some of this re-write and the notation that all references to global warming had been changed to “the mainstream accepted scientific view of global warming” and that articles about skepticism were being considered for deletion because of objectional content

wiki could have been a good site- now it is so tainted as to be nonauthoritative


3 posted on 12/30/2009 6:35:33 AM PST by silverleaf (More folks being invited to the White House for Holiday parties than are being sent to Afghanistan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: silverleaf

Wikipedia was never authoritative and I don’t believe it was ever intended to be. It’s a good place to start, but certainly if that’s where you end your investigation you are going to be less smart than you think you are.


13 posted on 12/30/2009 7:02:07 AM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson